249
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

The Trump administration abruptly halted USAID’s foreign aid funding and restructured the agency, provoking alarm among experienced staff and legal experts.

Political appointees, assisted by Elon Musk’s engineers, seized control of IT systems, imposed swift stop-work orders, and placed thousands of workers on leave.

Experts warned these actions likely violated multiple federal laws, including the Privacy Act and the Impoundment Control Act, raising serious constitutional concerns.

Federal worker groups have filed lawsuits and a judge’s injunction halted layoffs, while congressional inquiries and legal challenges look to restore due process.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 141 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"may have"

So tired of this pussy fucking bullshit from the media.

We're literally on the verge of a Constitutional Crisis because of the law-breaking.

Fucking grow a pair ProPublica.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

You're almost always in the thread and on message in the comments before I click on it.

Keep it up friend. You're doing good work.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago

That's not necessarily a good thing, for my own mental health especially.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

But for real, take care of yourself.

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 11 points 1 week ago

If there’s no punishment, did you really break the law?

[-] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Laws only exist if they can be enforced. The president has just about any power if the court says so, or if the court says no and the president says "fuck you make me".

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If he hasn't been convicted, then he hasn't factually broken the law. If he hasn't factually broken the law, then saying he has is considered defamation and opens ProPublica up to lawsuits, and unfortunately, they would lose, since that would be textbook defamation.

That's why everything like this gets wrapped in things like "allegedly" or "may have" because it allows them to report the facts of what happened and the laws in question without making that final link, which is something only the courts can do.

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 week ago
[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago

repeatedly and habitually. they break more laws more often than junior dips a finger into his pocket.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

34-time convicted felon, rapist, con artist, and insurrectionist broke the law?!

Well that certainly wasn't on my 2025 bingo ca-- oh wait, no there it is, I always forget about the free one in the middle.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

The trump administration breaking the law isn't news. Them actually getting in trouble for it, now THAT would be news.

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 4 points 1 week ago

People who are involved in the process of making new laws, are also the ones breaking them. There might be a slight conflict of interest, don’t you think?

Nah, it’s probably fine. What could go wrong.

[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

sigh … add it to the pile

[-] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just the executive orders given during the first day sparked a bunch of lawsuits. What can you expect from the rest. Judges have their work cut out for them for years to come.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Well, in a functioning government this would be the point at which Congress impeaches and convicts Trump for breaking the law. We saw how well that happened last time Trump was in office and kept breaking the law.

[-] OppaGundamStyle@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago

Now get someone to prosecute them.

Broken or not, the law is only as good as it’s upheld.

[-] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

"Felon may have broken the law" is already a tiring headline, and it's not even been a fucking month

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Most probably. USAID distributes money and goods according to the budget, which is set by the legislative branch. The executive may not mess with that.

this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
249 points (99.2% liked)

News

25243 readers
1651 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS