843
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

The Office of Special Counsel, an independent agency that oversees illegal actions taken against federal workers, ruled that the mass firings of probationary federal workers (those in a trial period after being hired) are likely illegal.

The decision, affecting 6 cases, found that the terminations lacked individualized cause, violating federal rules.

OSC head Hampton Dellinger stated, "Firing probationary employees without individualized cause appears contrary to a reasonable reading of the law."

This ruling could challenge the legality of nearly all such dismissals, opening the door for broader legal action.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 132 points 1 year ago

It's kind of funny (the sad kind of funny) that people with years of legal studies and experience have to meet and formally rule that something blatantly illegal to the point of stupidity is... well... illegal.

"If I have a made-up position that my own government admits is not an official one, can I go ahead and randomly fire thousands of people?"

"A ha! Good question, let's see what my copy of The Legal System for Dummies says!"

[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago

I mean, they know it's not "legal", they are just testing the boundaries of judicial oversight. They are going to push boundaries and whenever they get any kind of push back they are going to scream about persecution and claim judicial over reach.

The point is to overwhelm the system to the point of breaking and then claim we don't need to listen to the judicial system, because look how broken it is.

These people aren't stupid, they're just fascist who know things like legal systems are social contracts that depend on good will and trust to operate. If they can break that good will and trust them they can rewrite the social contract.

It is dangerous to assume these people are just stupid.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Just gonna quote the smart relevant alarming resharable parts of this comment

I mean, they know it's not "legal", they are just testing the boundaries of judicial oversight. They are going to push boundaries and whenever they get any kind of push back they are going to scream about persecution and claim judicial over reach.

The point is to overwhelm the system to the point of breaking and then claim we don't need to listen to the judicial system, because look how broken it is.

These people aren't stupid, they're just fascist who know things like legal systems are social contracts that depend on good will and trust to operate. If they can break that good will and trust them they can rewrite the social contract.

It is dangerous to assume these people are just stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s kind of funny (the sad kind of funny) that people with years of legal studies and experience have to meet and formally rule that something blatantly illegal to the point of stupidity is… well… illegal.

Well yeah - that’s how it works. If you don’t care about law and rules you just do shit. The people who enforce the rules have to follow them and go through processes - and by gum that’s time and work! (And who wants to do work? Definitely none of the judges and lawyers I’ve met lol)

If they imminent domain your house to build a turnpike to siphon off money to foreign investors - that’s on you to put the time and effort into fighting it. If they run voucher programs and charter school scams that benefit their friends - well, they have other friends who often are the ones supposed to enforce the rules. They act, you have to pull yourself together and react. How can you fight an illegal eviction if you’re too busy trying to find a new place to sleep?

It’s that old idea that the state has a monopoly on violence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 119 points 1 year ago

Ok. It is illegal. The question is, are they going to do anything about it?

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 53 points 1 year ago

This is the exact problem. Trump and Musk are walking through the forest firing a flamethrower indiscriminately, and there are a bunch of people on the outskirts yelling "Hey, you can't do that!"

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The smug entitlement it takes non-voters to think that it’s the voters that are to blame for this blows my mind.

Especially when it was those the voted that tried to warn everyone this exact thing was going to happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Styxia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

After considering this question carefully, I expect the answer is: the square root of fuck all.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

At some point all the people fired will likely get some money, some may get jobs. It probably takes at least a year for that to happen though.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Oh it's gonna cost the government a fortune in lawsuits, people will get their salary and job back

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

I found out yesterday the government employees who received a promotion are also put on probation. Someone I know was fired after 20years of service just for the crime of being a good enough employee to deserve a promotion.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 year ago

So they didn't even just limit it to new-hire probationary employees, but also included people who just entered a new title after being an employee for years?

So so so fucking dumb.

If we still have a functioning government and legal system after all of this is said and done, the federal government will be paying out billions of dollars in (completely reasonable) lawsuits.

Super efficient.

[-] parody@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

It’s easy to miss that kind of thing without testing. Traditionally it’s been considered a decent idea to spend more than six seconds firing thousands of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] credo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Was probably put on “supervisory probation” which is for all new supervisors. I.e., its not just an increase in pay due to increased skills/duties.

I know someone in the same boat and I was wondering if they would get caught in all this stupidity as well.

[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

So each fired employee saves, let's say, $75,000. Then each sues the government and wins a $250,000 settlement, and gets their job back. Of course the government spends $300,000 on lawyers for each case. The savings practically leap into our pockets!

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

There's also nothing efficient about firing people from various critical agencies and then scrambling to bring the back after their records have been purged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Exusia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's an ouroborus - a self feeding problem that will always be able to Boogeyman the problem it caused. Those employees will then be painted as wasting money by tying up courts for settlements, decried like the McDonald's coffee incident all over again.

[-] blattrules@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They deserve to get every penny of that too; it’s a stupidity tax.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While the decision is limited to those six workers, its implication is that all, or nearly all, of the mass firings of probationary government workers by President Donald Trump violate the laws regulating government employment

It’s only for the trainees at present, not sure why the title exaggerated

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 year ago

Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.

[-] spirinolas@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

How amoosing!

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

At some point, all of this is going to cost the taxpayers a lot of money in legal fees and settlements.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Even if it does, I am certain that Musk himself will have zero legal liability here. His position is unofficial, all his authority is "because Trump says so", and I strongly doubt he signing his name or signature on anything. That itself should scare people (even those who agree with what he's doing), but most Americans are just sleepwalking.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

If the USA had a functional justicebsystem, Musk would have been at least detained and bar from tpuchibg government systems... but alas, there is no functional law in the USA at the moment

[-] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Who needs the law when you've got money!

Oh, you don't have money. I guess you need the law.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It will either cost a lot in legal fees, or a lot in every fucking thing is broken everywhere and most services that were already busting at the seams to somewhat operate will just pop like melons under a giant truck tire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure anyone coming back, or that wants to ever join again will ask for more pay due to the fuckery and uncertainty it causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Litebit@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Yeah, his income level puts him on the "petty fine" tier.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I will accept no less than 99.99% of his net worth.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you want to leave him $4.02b?

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't that be 400 million? (400bil x 99.99%) Still a lot, and I could retire happily off that much for sure.

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mental arithmetic was never my strong point

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iamnotme@feddit.uk 39 points 1 year ago

Guess who’s getting fired in the morning

[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Not a goddamn person that needs to be fired. That's for sure.

[-] awesomesauce309@midwest.social 36 points 1 year ago

Now a look at tomorrows news: Trump orders the office of special counsel to let a 5 year old doge “employee” install a scraper in their server room with sysadmin access.

[-] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guaranteed trump just found out this office exists because of this ruling

[-] keckbug@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Actually, Hampton Dellinger himself was already fired earlier in the purge, but was temporarily reinstateted by a lower court and that was upheld by the Supreme Court (so far). It’s been one of the first cases to land on their desk, and is worth watching closely.

[-] notabot@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Where's the BOFH when you need him? The server room? Certainly, just through this doorway... Oh! Whoops, my mistake, that was the unfinished fire escape.

[-] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

But the DOGE guys are so cool. That guy is the next Tony Stark with a totally huge penis. And those children running the day to day workings of DOGE definitely slay pussy. Not punchable faces at all!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dellish@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but, what are you going to do about it? Trump is above the law and Elon certainly isn't going to be fined, let alone go to jail, over this. Courts and lawyers can cry all they want, who's going to enforce it? Nobody, that's who. So sure, Point out they're doing illegal things - the law doesn't seem to matter to those in charge any more.

[-] witten@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Get that defeatism out of here. They're only above the law if we let them be. To date, the Trump administration has backed off when a judge rules against them. Sure, they then try to come up with new, illegal shit to do. But the courts definitely still have a place in putting the brakes on it.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 year ago

sounds like elon just found some new inefficiency

/s

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm sure they'll stop right away!

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Oooohhh, and will he care? Will he stop?

No

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Oh man. They're gonna get it now!!! No way they get out of this without absolutely anything happening and just continue to do what they've been doing!!

[-] Zier@fedia.io 7 points 1 year ago

Everything President Felon and VP KetamineTrip are doing is illegal. And it will cost BILLIONS in the end to fix. Money that was need for more important things.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
843 points (99.1% liked)

News

36384 readers
811 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS