320
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump reversed his directive to fire thousands of probationary (newly-hired) federal employees after a judge ruled the mass terminations were likely illegal.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) clarified that agencies are not required to comply with previous instructions to fire employees who have held their jobs for a year or less. Instead, agencies have until September 13 to develop their own staffing reduction plans.

Some agencies, like the National Science Foundation (NSF), are now rehiring previously fired employees.

Federal labor unions have sued, arguing the firings violated procedural rules and congressional authority. The administration’s sudden reversal still leaves uncertainty about affected workers' status.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whyrat@lemmy.world 128 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Imagine the loss in productivity from having so many people fired & quickly re-hired. Not just from those people; but the HR & administrative effort; the re-org of responsibilities among the other employees; and the nonsense time it probably took up in so many "mandatory departmental meetings" discussing what was happening...

[-] kungen@feddit.nu 12 points 4 months ago

Plus the morale kick. "Oh yeah, we fired you a couple weeks ago without making too much of a fuss... but yeah, now get back to work!"

[-] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

Ah yes typical Government Efficiency

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Let's be very clear: this is extremely atypical. There is nothing even slightly normal about it.

[-] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

That sounds super inefficient. Someone should create a taskforce to look into that inefficiency.

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

This is partof the point

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

At my site in the VA we lost a essential employee who we probably won't get back.

And we were also forced into a hiring freeze at the start of the year so I hope they see this and try to come back, because we won't be able to hire someone else to replace them.

[-] trumpetmouth@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

not very.... what's the word?

oh yea: efficient.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So.. funny story (well not funny, horrible).

So a friend of mine recently (within the past 3 years) was motivated to go back to school and get their degree in conservation biology. They had been a chef for a while and were sick of it. I pushed them to quit their job and get back into it, and they did.

They ended up getting an internship with a federal department, and are still technically a probationary employee (not career or term). They are still in school but the work was what they wanted to be doing, so they went for it.

So it turns out, almost all the career and term staff have now been let go. But they, as a probationary employee, are still there. Like somehow they were missed or forgotten. So now, somehow, they are in charge or at least responsible... for almost everything?

Its the smokey the bear meme about "only you; no seriously its just you now" in real life.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

So it turns out, almost all the career and term staff have now been let go. But they, as a probationary employee, are still there. Like somehow they were missed or forgotten. So now, somehow, they are in charge or at least responsible… for almost everything?

His last co-worker as they walked out the door:

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Clearly a surgical strike, just using medical knowledge from the paleolithic

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Congrats to them on the meteoric career advancement, I guess? 😬

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Probably because he hasn't tried to conserve anything yet. I hear Republicans hate that.

[-] TheEschatonSucks@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 months ago

Jesus Christ what a fucken shitshow

I guess he’s finally running the country like a Trump business, I just don’t get why the yukyuks think it’s a good idea

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 32 points 4 months ago

legitimately the apprentice convinced them he's a business genius even though that was all manufactured, and the true trump is a nepobaby shitstain who can't outperform an index fund. he's always gambling, always losing, and always having someone bail him out. first it was daddy, then the bank, then the mob, then the russian federation, and now it's us, the poor

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago

I never understood why people liked that (shit) show. I tried watching it once and couldn't stand listening to his fucking stupidity.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

I grew up watching it. In the era of linear TV, even with cable we had maaaybe 2 or 3 other legitimate options for family TV time on that night, at that time. It was non-offensive (funny saying that about Trump now), family friendly, reality TV. I know it's not everyone's cup of tea, but it was well produced, and mindlessly entertaining.

Now, at the same time, while I understand for many people, "the apprentice convinced them he’s a business genius," that's SOOO frustrating. I completely agree with you about "his fucking stupidity." I think the first few seasons, they cut it well to make him appear intelligent. However, as the show went on, I suspect he wanted more and more screen time, and that distracted from the actual show and that's when we started to notice "his fucking stupidity" showing.

[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I never watched the show (thankfully), but I always thought that having Trump ridicule/fire these people was part of the 'entertainment/joke' aspect of everything because he himself was widely regarded as a joke of businessman... person... Ya know, just a joke in general.

Imagine my surprise to find out - decades later - that apparently not everyone was in on the joke...

[-] cyphear@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

The only one I watched was the one with Gene Simmons. The "goal" was to make I think like $5000 by running a hotdog stand. So Gene, a real businessman, sold one hotdog with his signature to a fan. At the end of the episode Trump fired him. Because of some bullshit reason. I think it was because Trump didn't like that Gene was more popular than he was and knew how to do marketing.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Trump businesses were grifts or fronts for money laundering for the Russians, so yeah, that tracks.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

The uncertainty is by Design

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 11 points 4 months ago

Gaslighting. Now when feds complain about loosing their jobs, trumpets will say they're spreading fake news. Also, I know some feds who are also trumpets. Watching their brain explode isn't worth the apocalypse.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 months ago
[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

This constant "asking the crowd if he is doing a dumb" kind of feels like on idiocracy, during monday night rehabilitation when the executioner is at first seemingly pandering to the crowd, and then you start to realise he actually needs their help to find Not Sure.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

I swear to God he's a BattleTech villain

I can come up with no other plausible explanation for this level of incompetence

[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

plausible explanation for this level of incompetence

Competence is irrelevant. He's not here to "govern effectively", he's here to dismantle the U.S. and its allies and turn them into vassal states for the CCP, Putin Regime, the House of Saud, and any other authoritarian who wants in on the action.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I'd say that's accurate yeah

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Wait wait wait! Innersphere or Clan? Not Comstar...

Ah! The Word of Blake!

All Word of Blake factions agreed on a few points. They decried ComStar and its members as heretics for defying the ancient doctrines claimed to be in the writings of Jerome Blake. They denounced as forgeries the recently discovered writings of Blake and mourned ComStar as being destroyed from within, claiming that salvation was only possible by fleeing from ComStar's "corrupted vision" and joining the Word of Blake.

source

[-] NeilBru@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I feel Word of Blake could work for the Trumpers but part of them seem similar to Katherine Steiner-Davion sycophants.

As an aside, I always preferred House Davion in the Inner Sphere, however my first loves were the Warden Wolves and the Ghost Bears. Honorable mention to the Nova Cats and a hale shout-out to The Wolf's Dragoons.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Some agencies, like the National Science Foundation (NSF), are now rehiring previously fired employees.

Trump's power derives from the fact that he is running an organization that consists of three million people. He has started off his second term by ensuring that a not inconsiderable number of these have a grudge against him, and are now back where they were. Possibly not the move most-likely to ensure that his agenda is effectively-enacted.

Instead, agencies have until September 13 to develop their own staffing reduction plans.

That's probably more-reasonable simply from an organizational standpoint. That being said, that's about half the distance until midterms, at which point the Democrats might take the House. If they do, they are probably going to punch holes in attempts to mass-fire federal employees. Plus, if they can take actions that trigger re-hirings, if someone is laid off for a brief period of time, even a layoff for a few months may not last. Historically, the party of the President usually does poorly in midterms.

There's a window of time that Trump has to really produce a lasting effect, where he can blow away a big chunk of the federal government and it would be hard to reconstitute it, and I think that this has probably caused it to significantly shrink.

Also, usually you don't, as a President, want to take unpopular actions right before elections. Better to do them immediately afterwards, as he is here.

Basically, if the bureaucracy can manage to stall for the better part of a year on top of this, I suspect that Trump's going to have difficulty slicing a lot of the Executive Branch away permanently.

[-] Benjaben@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the optimism. I sure hope you're right, this does feel at least plausible to me.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

It's such bullshit that all this is at the whim of one brain-damaged grandpa.

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 7 points 4 months ago

So they're bringing them back to let them go again in September. I guess that's a nice cushion for people to go elsewhere, but still stupid way to go about cost reduction.

[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Your first mistake would be believing this has anything even renotely to do with cost reduction

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

At the courts still hold some power as a check and balance.

He wouldn't be doing this otherwise.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Oh ho ho, is the fuhrer getting self conscious or is there a rift between the potus and doge?

[-] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Guignols level administration

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
320 points (99.1% liked)

News

31139 readers
1036 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS