28
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KanataLemmy@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

No problem with increasing spending but I do have a problem with the US integration. Time to re-evaluate needs to be taken.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

We're short on time so certain decisions must be made now.

[-] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

It’s tough for me to understand if this is a necessary expenditure or an excessive waste. On the positive, our allies want us to increase our defense budget and this will definitely put that number up.

It does seem prudent to be able to better patrol our northern waters to guard against internet cable cutting b.s.

I'm hardly an expert, but I think the Navy is in notoriously bad shape, even by Canadian national defense standards.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

It is. I would say (in my entirely non-expert opinion) that any naval spending now is worth more than any navy spending later, simply because it gets the ball rolling sooner.

I think we need to have a more robust military, a more resilient supply chain, and more reliable equipment. These frigates have been being planned for a while, dragging it out longer just differs cost, and military capability is built capacity; your military does missions with the equipment is has, not the equipment it will have.

The best time to build these frigates was probably years ago, then we would be in a much better position. The next best time is now.

Are these frigates perfect? Probably not, especially with the newfound unreliability of our historic friend, ally and brother nation the US. Thing is, I don't think there is a perfect solution to this. Plus never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

Also, we live in a more dangerous world, and Canadian prosperity will suffer. Being a robust partner to our reliable allies and being self reliant on defence will reduce that loss of prosperity. Defence spending should be seen as an investment, or more akin to an insurance policy.

#ElbowsUp

[-] badwetter@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 23 hours ago

@Grimpen@lemmy.ca

Money would probably be better spent on drone tech—land, sea, subSurface and air. Bigger bang for the buck and the future. Large surface vessels are considerable targets. Tactics have evolved.

@ValueSubtracted@startrek.website @puppinstuff@lemmy.ca

[-] JC1@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

Please arm chair general, let's invest in drones and send you specifically to patrol our northern waterways. I'd like to see you intercept a Russian or American vessel violating our territorial waters with your drones.

I don't say that drones are bad, it's just 2 entirely different tools.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

It is very important as we've been lazy with our naval and military procurement ... because America was right next door.

We can't count on them anymore for anything. So it's past time to do it.

Whether or not we buy the F-35s is still up in the air.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I keep advocating for GCAP (Global Combat Air Program), a partnership between Japan, UK and Italy to develop a 6th generation fighter. We can't pull off an Avro Arrow 2: 2Fast2Arrow any more, our domestic aviation industry has atrophied too much. Even if it hadn't, it's just getting too complex.

Joining our more reliable allies, even as a junior partner we can reinvigorate our domestic aerospace industry and get a 6th gen fighter out the back end.

There is a problem, GCAP isn't scheduled to deliver until 2035, so we still need a stopgap. F35 is the most capable, but also most expensive. It's also in progress. I like Gripen personally, but it would mean starting again from scratch pretty much. Granted with a more basic craft, so maybe even faster to upgrade as a stopgap? Past my pay grade, but GCAP seems an obvious way to signal a long term commitment, with very attractive benefits along the path ^(the real 6th generation fighter was the domestic aerospace industry we reinvigorated along the way). Plus it draws us together with more reliable allies.

There is an alternative to GCAP, FCAS (Future Combat Air System), a partnership between France, Germany, and Spain. It seems less urgent, with a scheduled delivery of 2040. Plus it's all EU+NATO, so something about eggs and baskets… although I trust the EU and other NATO countries more than the US right now.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
1904 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS