309
Fucking leeches (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JesterAUDHD@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago

I remember looking up just the air b&b’s in the Portland metro and there were over 4,000…..

A large majority of the rest were being rented.

The wealthy are buying it all with no regulation.

There should be one home per family in the suburbs. One vacation place and your house. No one needs 10 properties, get rich another way you greedy terrible fucks.

[-] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Rich people outbid regular folks for real resources (homes), taking away any chance at intergenerational wealth building. the only (legal) answer at the moment is taxation of the rich.

Gary Stevenson has some worthwhile insights on what we can do and how to convince working class people that the rich must be stopped or else your kids and grandkids will all be homeless renters.

inequality is sharply risinh all around the world. and it's getting worse. this is arguably the most important issue of our time.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

the only (legal) answer at the moment is taxation of the rich.

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago

Because the only way to escape an exploitative system is to become an exploiter...

[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

I realise they don't care, and are disingenuous about their suggestions... But these people think the solution for people not being able to afford shit is "get a, better job" or in this case specifically, "become landlord"...

How do you expect society to function if every, single, person, is a landlord? Who's building the houses, cleaning after tenants stay, growing, harvesting, preparing food... Electricity?

Like, it just blows my mind that people espouse dumb shit like this and get a pass from most people

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Someone that used to hang out on the Discord server I'm part of justified it because "the world is divided between winners and losers. For there to be winners there have to be losers."

He was a real privileged asshole who worked in accounting for the US military. Loved how his paycheck was bigger than most soldiers, even some officers. Bitched for nearly a whole month about how the Obama administration was giving "free handouts" when the US pulled out of Afghanistan and gave all the veterans a care package.

I argued with him a lot. Nobody liked him. This is the kind of person the people from OP's meme are.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 21 points 3 weeks ago

Mooching off of others to fund your life style and giving nothing back in return

opens envelope

What's something considered classy if you're rich, but trashy if you're poor?

[-] DistressedDad@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago

I know people like this. They truly believe like they are doing society a favor by buying up houses and renting them out. The disconnect from reality is wild.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's a little better than corporate real estate vultures though. If you think about it, these small landlords and renters are more alike than the people at Blackrock buying up all this shit.

[-] voldage@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Just because they aren't faceless doesn't mean they aren't as bad. In case of corporations, at the very least, anyone up to CEO could claim they were doing what their boss/investors told them/expected them to do, they have the mirage of fabricated innocence. The guilt is also spread more thinly, with many, often low paid employees contributing a small portion towards the greater legal crime.

Small landlords have none of those delusions available, though from my personal, anecdotal experience, higher management in large corporations also often personally own real estate and rent it. I'm working in IT, but I have no reason to think it would be in any different elsewhere. I was led to understand it was "normal" and "smart". So I'd say it's the same kind of people that make decisions on top of the real estate corporations, and the petite landlords. And yeah, I'm excluding from that, obviously, renting a flat you've gotten as inheritance from your grandma or something, though I have more fundamental issues with the inheritance thing itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShitposterSupreme@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Well this is gross. Its extremely had to buy ONE property, to exist in, if you dont have Bank of Mom and Dad to rely on.

[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

If it would destroy the economy if everyone did it, then it should not be doable in the first place.

[-] phindex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is like saying that if everyone had a small business it would destroy the economy. If you think a rental damages the economy, you have no idea what the economy is, or how it works.

[-] flyingSock@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Businesses buy and sell off each other and also create value. But sticking with the "if everyone did this" every one would run a one person business. Not efficient but would work. On the other hand if everyone is renting out houses, they can at most be renting out one (ignoring foe now second houses/holiday apts). Then everyone would be housed and paying each other in a circle. So, no, everyone doing what the post suggests can not work. All but the first house would be empty.

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Here's a tip poor people; just have money!

[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago

Same people will be looking for a govt bailout when the real estate market collapses.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

All so that none of their tenants can afford any of those four things without constantly struggling!

[-] RandomStickman@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's because they haven't seen that tweet from a money genius who invented the cheat code on life. You just need more money streams for more money. Who knew? Here I was, just sitting with a gazillian dollars stuffed under my mattress nor knowing what to do with them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago

All i had to do was just buy 4 houses? Damn. I'm rich!

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

How does the second tenant pay their mortgage? One apartment's rent should not be enough to cover the mortgage of four (or five - including the one they live in). My guess is that they only payed all the mortgages for these four properties and this is about the mortgage of the apartment they live in.

The cheat code to a stress-free life is to own lots of real estate to being with.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, some rents are getting crazy and the buildings were purchased 10-20 years ago so the mortgage isn’t that high. It’s all a scam.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Of course they mean their own personal mortgage. The mortgage of the property they rent out is already covered by the tenant.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

In a word, corruption.

In two words, legal corruption.

In three words, blatant legal corruption.

In four words, United States political system.

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

Meh.

  1. This isn't an America problem. People do this in every country

  2. This is capitalism not corruption

For everyone here's a fun thought experience. You have a room with 100 people. In that room is 100$. 1 person (Elon Musk let's say) holds 95$. 4 people (let's say various CEO class people) hold $1 each. The remaining 95 people share the remaining 1$.

And yet here we are all fighting because some of our deluded asses think we are going to be one of those 5 people one day.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

Meh.

  1. This isn't an America problem. People do this in every country

It's WORSE in the US than in most other countries, including all other wealthy countries, though. Differences in scale matter

  1. This is capitalism not corruption

Taken to the extremes it will inevitably reach if not sufficiently restrained, capitalism IS corruption with fancy packaging. It's right in the name: it's an ism (belief system) where accruing capital is the most important of ALL things.

In every Western country other than the US, accepting large sums of money and other perks from rich people who want favors is the DEFINITION of corruption, whether or not there's a specifically stated quid pro quo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Step one: Have a shitton of money to buy property to rent out.
Oh, you don't have enough money? Hhm, have you tried not being poor?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I used to have my own place before my wife and I got married, and she had her own house too. When I moved in with her I decided to rent out my place to a friend, otherwise I'd have to still pay like $650 a month for my mortgage. I set my friends rent at $900 a month for him and a friend, with cats. I paid my mortgage and had some extra to save up in case a repair was needed. Average rent for an apartment (not a house) was 1200-1500 in the same area. My renters ended up taking better care of the house than I ever did. It was beautiful when they lived there. I ended up making about 5k to 10k extra bucks over the course of a few years and my mortgage was paid for me. Eventually they had to move out due to some issues between the two at which point I sold the house and made over six figures(net profit, not gross), off a house that cost less than $80,000 when I bought it.

See what I did there? I charged a reasonable rent and still made a totally stupid amount of money off of just one property. I wasn't a goddamn parasite who tried to bleed my tenants for everything they were worth.

People like these total shitbags. They're the reason why America's youth have no future

load more comments (38 replies)
[-] keiznklei@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

Henry George's ideas will catch on again someday, hopefully.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

They act like everyone could do this.

If everyone did this, the system would fail, because the profit here is scooped off the top with no actual production or service.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It would also require everyone to own 4+ houses which isn't exactly feasible

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
309 points (96.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11569 readers
90 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS