80
submitted 2 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

A Fox News host, Jessica Tarlov, highlighted Trump's declining approval ratings, citing a new Quinnipiac poll showing 53% of voters disapprove of his second-term performance.

Trump is "underwater on everything" including economy, federal workforce management, Ukraine-Russia policy, and trade relations with Mexico and Canada.

The polling slide comes amid stock market tumbles, federal worker layoffs, and trade tensions.

Tarlov noted that Republican members of Congress are facing hostile town halls where constituents are challenging them on federal workforce cuts, including at the VA. Some Republicans have dismissed these angry constituents as "paid actors."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

When the UK last had a moron setting everything on fire she was outlasted by a lettuce.

Americans need to up their game.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Sadly the US system is not designed to oust the president that easily. It would be a first if Trump was removed from office due to the impeachment process, removing the prime minister is a much lower bar.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Impeachment should theoretically work but when the system was put in place it didn't account for an entire political party turning fascist

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Impeachment should and still would work, my point was its a higher threshold than most processes to replace the PM in the UK.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It actually did, the south was entirely fascist for it's entire existence, they literally designed the system so the south could always veto the rest of the country combined no matter what, hence the 3/5 compromise giving them power in the house and the structure of the senate.

[-] Ferroto@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Sadly there isn't any equivalent to a non-confidence vote in US politics.

[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

How strong is your cabbage game?

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

He's not underwater where it really matters, physically.

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Right? Now do his head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

He has a positive approval rating in both houses of congress and the Supreme Court.

Also among mentally unstable billionaires.

Which is all that matters in reality.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Am I the only one who thinks 53% of people disapproving of his performance is actually a pretty good record for him. This number should be in the 90's.

[-] hapablap@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

You have to take into account that at least 30% of the total are likely "Trump is sent by God and is devinely inspired and therefore can do no wrong" crowd. So when his disapproval number hits 70% that's as high as it'll go.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Except I thought he was only elected by 31% of the public and at least a small portion of them are turning against him too. Remember a lot of people didn't vote.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I think if you give it a month or two that number is going to change significantly. Most people haven't really started to feel/see the consequences of his actions yet, and there is a bit of a lag.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This is very optimistic for the devotion behind a cult. People are already used to sacrificing for an oligarch.

[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I hope you're right and it ends this whole shit show.

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

I mean none of this matters he was popular on one night and that is all that counts.

[-] jaxxed@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Approval ratings only impact elections

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yes and no. It's really hard to boast about your "mandate" when a large and still increasing portion of the population publicly hates your guts and thinks you're doing a shit job. It's not enough by itself to meaningfully hurt him, but it does make him look bad and undermine his leadership. It is bad for his image, and image is an important component of power.

It's also bad for his ego and could potentially lead him to behave even more erratically in ways that are ultimately self-destructive. Narcissists famously don't do well in the face of being perceived negatively. The worse his ratings get, the more humiliating it will be for him. It is important to hurt their morale at every opportunity, even if it's not nearly enough to stop them on its own. Demoralized, defensive MAGA will always be a weaker foe than energized, popular MAGA.

[-] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Idk I've always noticed he doesn't give AF about reality. He just lies and if called out he just doubles down on his lies until he breaks the electorate and he gets elected again.

I used the same strategy to hide that I was smoking weed to my parents.

[-] EaterOfLentils@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's a narcissist. Trust me, he cares. Yes, he will lie. He will lie to the world and to himself. Because he literally CANNOT cope. But that isn't going to serve him. The more he lies to the world, the more deranged he will look, and the more he lies to himself, the more he will crash out mentally and self-destruct.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Until suddenly they impact everything.

[-] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

'He's underwater on everything' - except the one way that matters the most.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

His next plan will be to start a war

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Or Greenland, or Canada, or Mexico... Truly a winning strategy to threaten everyone all at once. 🙄

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Oh for sure, but he's said to draw up plans to get Panama. So right now that's the most "real" one

[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

My money is on Mexico, he has been placing brigades with Strykers and whatnot on that border. Whatever the case, still stupid and evil.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Shit. I hope those extra soldiers on the border that Mexico sent are enough deterrent

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So this greentext might actually come true?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

with his fucking cottage cheese brain he'll demand plans for invading Panama and then immediately invade Brazil

[-] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't see him starting a war without complete control of the military. While they are working on it, firing leadership, changing rules and policies, the military still has the power to say no to Trump, which is bad TV. Trump is also a bitch as seen by the wishy-washy way he approaches tariffs, he hates actual action because he just wants good TV and bad policy makes for bad TV.

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

On the one hand, I support a politician who does the right things despite public opinion. Fuck approval ratings. On the other hand, how can a single person be wrong about fucking everything? Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

I mean depends on how you look at it. In many ways, the world NEEDS to get off it's dollar addiction. Having a hegemonic currency isn't great for humanity as a whole. And Trump is doing the very best I've ever seen at helping the world cure itself of this problem. Not great for USA, but an important step for how geopolitics will work moving forward. Unless you meant doing everything wrong for Americans, then yes, Trump is awful.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

It’s pretty destabilizing globally too. I don’t see the dollar addiction going anywhere; it’s just changing currencies.

We really don’t need China or Russia (or KSA or EU) calling the shots globally either.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not sure it will change. The global south and more importantly BRICS has created a system where local currencies are used. It's basically a currency swap. If this can be extended to all nations there won't be a currency hegemon at all. Of course while it's been working well for the countries that are doing it, it's hard to say what the effects would be on a global scale. Still, we should work towards it. Note I am not talking about the BRICS currency, which is not real. Not even sure why it gets brought up at all.

*Edit. This is an article about the expansion of China's currency swap deals.

https://watcher.guru/news/brics-push-currency-swap-with-29-countries-worth-550-billion

Note that while this is about China, all BRICS nations are making currency swap deals with each other. It's just easier to find articles about China doing this because China is so massive.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago

People when the world's most illiterate celebrity does all of the dumb, racist shit he says he is going to do:

[-] girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I wonder - what is the actual audience for approval rating polls?

The folks most affected by high prices or mass layoffs are probably struggling too much to have the time or inclination. Around 30% of the country didn't even show up for the election, they probably won't show up for these.

Who does that leave us with? Can we really assume that '47% approval' translates to '47% of all Americans approve'?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hell must be freezing right now with FoxNews even calling out Trump. With tumbling stock market, I did not think that "voting with your wallet" actually works.

I am more curious as to what will Democrats do next in light of Trump admin's first hundred and more gaffes. Will the Democrats learn from their mistakes and reform? Or will they exploit Trump's gaffes like during Covid, but learn nothing and the Republicans will field someone worse for the next election (assuming there will be a next election)? Or, at worse, will Democrats continue to enable Trump like they are now with Chuck Schumer?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What's absolutely crazy is he just signed an EO to get rid of USAGM...

For those who don't know, that's basically the propaganda arm of the US government and has been for a very long time.

This is probably the most surprising thing so far for me, I really thought he'd expand that to do more work domestically to counteract all the bad press and approval loss his actions are resulting in.

Like, I get why Putin doesn't want the rest of the world to like us, but it's just crazy they're getting rid of USAGM instead of just changing the propaganda it spreads.

Actually kind of relieved to see it shut down, this is a weird morning.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago
[-] AbnormalHumanBeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.space 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Genuinely, though, it is hard to gauge at times which actions are:

  • Genuinely malicious plans to increase his and his cronies' wealth
  • Confused, because Elon or Trump were in a specific mood that particular day
  • Some actor behind the scenes manipulating them by taking advantage of their impulsivity
  • The genuine incompetence of the newly appointed loyalists (or the algorithms/AI they use) within the new deep state
  • Genuinely ideologically motivated stupidity, from Libertarians that drank their own cool-aid within the administration.

It is genuine chaos. But overall, the effects are pretty disastrous, no matter what exactly causes which actions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dzso@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm looking at Trump as a Russian agent who was assigned to dismantle the US government. Everything he does makes sense when you look at it that way. And it's horrifying.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

"What Fox just reported is illegal."
-- DJT

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

News

28075 readers
1438 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS