12

Discord was already succumbing to enshitification. Now with their intention to be owned by Wall Street, that trajectory will certainly accelerate at warp speed once the change of hands happens.

Anyone already get ahead of this and find a solid alternative?

Right now I'm on the fence between Element for Matrix, and Revolt. Both seem to have their pros and cons and I can't find a clear "winner".

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

An alternative would need screen share, just voip is not enough any more.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The problem is that performant screenshare (to multiple users) more or less requires infrastructure. That requires money, and it's impossible to compete on price with services that have the VC-enshitification model.

You can get around this in a few ways, but they're all tradeoffs that are in some way or other worse than discord.

  • P2P - sacrifice latency, reliability
  • direct multi-stream - sacrifice PC performance and/or bitrate
  • paid infrastructure - sacrifice money
[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I think P2P is still the way to go. Sure it's not perfect, but it's simpler and by it's very nature doesn't require the infrastructure we know will be a problem.

Plus, don't forget screen sharing in discord isn't very good as is (720p30) if you're not a paid user.

[-] Kuvwert@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Ah this is so exciting!

Discord 'existing' has held back development motivation on Foss Federated Communication alternatives.

When they go public only good things will happen for projects like matrix :)

I'm very excited!

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

I feel like matrix isn't a one-to-one replacement. It's a good slack replacement.

I haven't used matrix enough to know for sure but does it have the discord equivalent of servers?

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

those are called spaces there. but there's no flexible roles system. also no hop-on voice channels yet, but that's a client feature so maybe that's a bit different

[-] assaultpotato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I'm running a Matrix server with a FB Messenger bridge via mautrix-meta and that makes it a clear winner. Half my group chats have migrated entirely since I've set my close friends up with accounts in my server and they also use the bridge. The fact that people can slowly migrate chats without losing messages or groups is killer for adoption imo.

[-] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Did you follow a guide, or know one you could link? I'm thinking this is the path for me and my friends too.

[-] pory@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

it's Element/Matrix if we're lucky. Revolt is just another Discord - surely this single company will last! With Element/Matrix being an open protocol, it won't be a "platform" you have to leave when it goes corporate.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

Nheko provides an interface that is reminiscent of Discord. Fully featured and fast Matrix client.

[-] kitnaht@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Revolt is F/OSS

https://github.com/revoltchat/

It's not just a company with a clone of Discord, all the server back end, etc is open.

Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker. It means that you either:

  1. Use their servers - This requires entrusting them with your communities, just like Discord.
  2. Host your own private instance - You can control it, but the lack of federation means it'll be isolated from communicating with other communities. This makes it really difficult to convince people to use your self-hosted servers.

Until Revolt adds a way for different instances to federate, Matrix is really the only other option.

[-] aleq@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

My experience with Matrix is that the federation itself is a deal breaker. I have a pretty beefy server and good connection which was getting ddosed by running Matrix and timing out on so many requests for avatars/profiles etc. Maybe I did something wrong, but the whole experience rendered me quite skeptical to the viability of it as a federated chat.

That said I've had nothing but good experiences using it with big servers set up by pros.

I get why Federation can cause issues (most of the time it's moderation related), but why would an extra option be a deal-breaker? Federation can always be disabled on a per-domain basis if you prefer. In fact, I'd argue it's best practice to only allow domains on a case-by-case basis to prevent spam and abuse.

On the converse, you can't enable Federation on a platform that doesn't have it.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They were talking about matrix itself, not a specific option. And I’m not going to lie, having to hand hold your servers federation choices seems like a hassle. At that point why not just use a self hosted, non federated option?

[-] white_nrdy@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I think the point they're making is you can effectively have a self hosted non federated option with Matrix. Just disable federation as a whole (which I'm pretty sure is completely possible. Given companies use matrix for comms, and might not want federation, for similar reasons to what is being discussed here)

[-] drkt_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

That doesn't really change that it's one company hosting it. Unless you're willing to make 10 different accounts because your super-FOSS friends aren't willing to join each others instances?

[-] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago

Sadly I found out yesterday:

Matrix is not a community-based software, it was born [00] in Amdocs [01], a multinational corporation founded in Israel.

https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html

Many were claiming its impossible to get contributions merged as well.

I would be happy to find out this information is wrong or outdated.

[-] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Feels like fud.

Matrix is a set of standards and governed by an open foundation https://matrix.org/foundation/about/

Also there are many different server implementations and its hard to believe they all send your data to some third entity. In other words, what is stated by that link is just plain false. Not to mention that today there are quite many clients as well and I find the bridge point a bit... Idiotic.

You are free to use matrix.org but makes way more sense to self host your instance, and maybe not even use Synapse but something more "modern" as server.

[-] shym3q@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've started my self-hosting journey having Matrix in mind - especially the Matrix bridges to cut off the need to use social media clients like Discord.

Today, I'm slowly convicting my friends to join my instance. So far, that's just one of the closest ones (still win for me).

I hope one day decentralization in social media would take off!

[-] Turnbomb@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Is there any option to stay on discord but better? Like vencord or something similar through Linux? I cannot imagine being able to get my friends off of discord ever.

[-] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 months ago

Not entirely related, but why do so many people use Discord? What's the appeal? I only ever used it as a replacement vor teamspeak or ventrilo. And I honestly hate most online games.

[-] pathief@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I've been using it for several years. I have a small server I use with my IRL friends and it works great.

  • Near 100% availabily
  • Nice sound quality
  • Supports multiple servers for your multiple interests
  • UI is amazing
  • Works fine on every platform
  • Screen sharing / streaming is easy
  • Cool to see what your friends are playing
  • Free plan is more than enough, you can pay for cosmetics or higher stream quality.
[-] kr0n@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

+1. It's like an IRC channel but improved and easy to use.

When I started in the online games, we used IRC + TeamSpeak. Now we only use Discord since it has all of them in only one app but it's better (except the ads), easier and you also has a Mobile App.

[-] patrlim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

The UI is actually kinda ass, but we all got used to it.

Me and my friends moved to matrix, but we still use discord for streaming.

[-] pathief@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Compared to the software we were using before such as Skype, TeamSpeak, Ventrilo and Mumble.... The UI is amazing.

I'd happily move to Matrix but I'd lose all the servers for my hobby interests. No point in having both.

[-] pinguin@fault.su 1 points 1 month ago

Matrix is a solid option, a lot of activity there as well

[-] Forester@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honestly, I am ready to go straight back to TeamSpeak.

I miss hosting my own server and having full access and control over it

I used to just host it on a piece of shit. 2003 Dell XP machine I put Ubuntu on

[-] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Matrix is the way. It's federated and you can have your own server.

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

It never made sense to me how popular discord was to begin with.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2 points 2 months ago

@Xanza@lemm.ee Among my friends, it replaced Facebook Messenger, Teamspeak, and Mumble instantly. It was fast and the voice quality was excellent. The appeal in 2017 was obvious. The bloat that it had tacked onto it since then is egregious.

Don't get me started on the "rewards"...

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago
  • persistent IRC style chat rooms
  • virtual “servers” to organize said chat rooms, manage privileges, control visibility
  • integration with bots for all sorts of things (moderation, user welcome, dice rollers, etc.)
  • integration with games/music players/etc (I don’t use it but it’s very popular)
  • privacy and moderation controls
  • client allows fine grained notification controls
  • voice, video, and screen casting simultaneously
  • “server” templates: use an existing server config (roles, permissions, rooms, etc.) when creating a new server.

That’s just off the top of my head.

It’s enshittifying, but the value proposition is still hard to beat. I’m really hoping Matrix catches up with the feature set soon.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 months ago

Its popularity is more inertia based

[-] u_u@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

It used to be fast and not full of useless bloat like what you see right now. The usual enshittification.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Why use Element for matrix?

From what I can tell it collets and links data to you: Location, identifiers and contact information.

How is that private or better than Signal?

[-] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

Signal is centralized and require a phone number to register, it's not private at all.

[-] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That’s bullshit.

A) Privacy =/= anonymity

B) They have usernames and the option to hide your number from searches for those interested.

C) Signal has absolutely no way of accessing any of your information: https://signal.org/bigbrother/ They publish all their subpoenas and there is no information that are able to collect. It’s all encrypted.

D) Phone numbers are an easy way onboard the normies and Meta addicts that don’t value privacy.

[-] index@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 months ago

Your phone number is tied to your identity, there are no reasons to ask it to begin with.

[-] XiberKernel@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Honest question, but on a technical level isn’t discord basically IRC with some bells, whistles, emojis, and a some WebRTC Logic wrapped in electron with a large marketing budget? Throw in some cloud storage and a CDN for images. What am I missing? I’m not saying it’s “easy”, but I’m curious what it would take to build a solid streamlined FOSS alternative built on combining existing technologies.

Edit: I’m not familiar with the ecosystem… is the issue with existing FOSS bad UI and complicated onboarding? Missing features? Or is it simply a critical mass issue?

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

In addition to the replies you got already, discord has screen sharing/streaming. An experience kind of like zoom (I don't use it and dont see the appeal but maybe someone who does can elaborate more. My partner uses this feature sometimes).

[-] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Discord is not even necessarily Electron. I'm running it as Datcord, which is a Firefox based wrapper.

Discord has a searchble chat history, which is what sets it apart from IRC. Everything else can be emulated by modern IRC clients, such as emoji and embedded / unfurling images and link previews.

However imagine the chat history as if you had a bouncer that has 100% uptime and joined all possible chat channels from their creation, along with offering you search and buffer.

If not IRC, either Matrix or XMPP should be capable of this.

I'm fairly sure Discord's popularity was due to aggressive marketing, likely during their venture capital funding rounds. Something which FOSS does not have.

this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

48243 readers
216 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS