Sorry, but I've seen some comically bad reporting coming from this site in the past. Pretty sure clickbait is a significant part of their business model.
This page is so bad it's the only blocked website on my google news feed blacklist. I'd not take anything from that website seriously
every time someone, including myself quotes the population of China, (officially 1.4 billion), I think about the huge towns in the middle of nowhere that I've been to and think "or maybe 2 billion"
TBH China's population is likely less than the official figure, but they could easily accommodate more. There are tons of empty apartment buildings everywhere, and most of the country is still empty. Most people don't intuitively grasp population density at scale but it's shocking how little space we all take up with good urbanism.
If people were to stand shoulder to shoulder, the entire population of the world could fit into half of Prince Edward Island. If the world's population was in a single city with the density of Paris, it would be the size of Iraq. To put that in perspective, Paris is the 35th most dense city in the world. If you matched the density of the densest city in the world, it would be about the size of Uruguay.
Of course, each person needs much more land to survive, and more still if they're to live the lifestyle we in the developed world enjoy.
I don't like living in a dense urban area, but undoubtedly it is the way to keep the planet healthy and us alive.
Vertical farming and efficiencies of providing services to denser areas, along with re-wilding areas for carbon capture all seem like part of the puzzle.
In the real world though, how do you get the entire population of the US to move to a handful of cities?
How would we even pay for the infrastructure development with our current model of building it and then ignoring it until we have to put a bandaid on it
Yeah, I don't see us all moving into cities, although many people already have. I also don't think we need to have one giant city - those numbers were given to show how little actual living space people need, keeping in mind that Paris doesn't seem to be viewed as somewhere undesirable to live, and still has room for beauty and not just urban utilitarianism.
On the flip side, many people who move to the city do so for work. I hope we see less of that, where things can be more decentralized so people who like a less urban environment can still effectively contribute to society and the economy without having to stifle their personal living preferences. I'd also like to see less cost-efficient but more space-efficient growing conditions for agriculture so more land can be returned to a natural state while still supporting the populations we have. Both vertical farming and vertical living can contribute to that. And I absolutely realize that livestock tend to be both less cost- and space-efficient, especially if it's humane.
Yeah, the only way I see reducing livestock is if the cost gets unacceptable for the working class. Nobody wants to hear "you need to eat plants". Would require a culture shift in the US at least
Chickens are surprisingly effective as far as meat animals go.
I'm super interested in insects too. Im growing spirulina right now to experiment if it can be a protein source
and this here is the only advantage of single family zoning, preventing the scourge of urbanism from taking root by cutting it off at the housing.
Single family home zoning was designed for racism and really shouldn't exist anymore
I personally know of ~400 people who are absolutely not counted on any census and I'd be willing to bet not included in any population stats. Whole town up in the mountains. I'd imagine if that can happen in the us, it's not unlikely to happen elsewhere, so sure... But when they do the whole earth population calculations, I always assumed they just checked in a few extra people to account for, like, uncounted towns and shit
I'd bet that in many countries, the "census" cares more about its status as a gov't official, than it does about accurate-counting, too..
While I'd been unconsciously assuming that the world population-count was somehow accurate,
my KNOWING of how rural people work to evade being counted contradicts my own assumption,
& your identifying that entire villages that aren't counted.. damn, damn, damn, have I ever been being ignorant/naive..
Thank you for pointing this obvious-in-hindsight behavior out, for us!
_ /\ _
This smells like some kind of bias. Find a measuring error in one situation and then project the maximum error onto everything.
Any statisticians here, is there a name for this?
The title is, unsurprisingly, heavily exaggerated. The study does not claim there are "billions more people". They studied 307 different dam construction projects around the word, and found the actual number of affected people in those rural areas was like 40-80% higher than estimated.
Their conclusion is that it's likely the population of the world is quite underestimated, but they don't want to guess by how much, that's all cooked up by the "journalist".
This smells like
Don't get too scientific now.
It's just a study. Like many others. All studies are biased in some way. A proper scientific study can question status quo and or provide alternate views or methods.
In the end most scientists find 8 B people a reasonable and probable amount. But they don't know, as those are estimates. The guys from this new study just used a different approach and come up with maybe 1B more.
Even if we can have more people, we probably shouldn't tbh
Arr you suggesting some action should be tsken? Or...?
The biggest scam we've been sold is that birth rates are down and we'll be running low on people!
Yet zoomers is the largest population EVER.
You have UK "needing immigration to sustain population decline" while it wasn't declining. They used them to drive the labour costs down and rents up.
It is though. UK birth rate is well below replacement level and immigration is not enough to make up for it.
The math may not be obvious because that is a decrease in births now, that will become apparent in about 30 years when they would have children and previous large generations pass. You can either try to compensate now when it’s easy or wait 30 years until it’s a crisis with no way out and even if there was, it would take 30+ years
Millennials are still the larger demographic (ever) by about 3.5 million people.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/