140
submitted 5 days ago by NightOwl@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 days ago

Sounds like every policy of the war on terror.

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 15 points 5 days ago

How else are we supposed to give nearly half of the discretionary spending to defense contractors? We can't just make a big pile of all the bombs, that would be dangerous. Dropping them on poor people ensures they are only dangerous for a brief amount of time, with minimal risk to the ruling class.

[-] bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net 19 points 5 days ago

When you spend infinite billion dollars through your regional "partners" who knowably executed 9/11 bombing a country for a decade and the rebels STILL take the capitol and you have no real targets because you have forged Dune-style Fremen, while you officially ally with Al Qaeda as the government of Syria a few years after surrendering to the Taliban in Afghanistan... #winning

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 days ago

The "anti war" president.

[-] teri@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 days ago

And it costs innocent people their lives or makes it at least very miserable. Yeah, what to spend billions for...

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"Is this just an excuse to funnel public money into private military contracts?"

"Ye man"

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
140 points (99.3% liked)

World News

35500 readers
371 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS