20
This conspiracy theory is missing the part that explains debit cards.
I mean, that's already the case for the majority of peoples' transactions now. It's a bit late to worry about it.
That said, we have our transaction badges (debit cards) to do transactions, and so long as we continue to use those, there won't be a mandatory requirement to have your phone on you. At the same time, all those transactions are still stored and linked to you by your card provider, so you still lose privacy.
On top of that, everyone brings their phones pretty much wherever they go regardless of transactions, because they're deeply helpful devices. That already gives you telemetry at all times, which can be logged in various systems.
TLDR: The loss of privacy happened as early as 2 decades ago. It's just becoming worse as time goes on.
The death of privacy started with purchases only electronically. Cash needs hoops
Considering how many people are already walking around with smartphones, isn’t the hypothetical “no privacy” future you’re scared of already here?
(Is this too “deep” to be on “casual” conversation?)
Indeed. Locking now to keep the existing comments. Feel free to crosspost to a more generic Ask community.
What your thoughs on this?
My thoughts? I would change 'society', move to some other one.
Hello,
Is this too “deep” to be on “casual” conversation?
Probably, you might want to crosspost to a general ask community like !ask@lemm.ee or !asklemmy@lemmy.world
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
20 points (73.8% liked)
Casual Conversation
3135 readers
214 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS