[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago

It's a meme, I'm not writing comprehensive policy here

I'm responding to your comment, not the post. This part:

If a disabled person ... their disability should therefore ....

You really can't make generalizations about disabilities like this.

Lots of people think disabilities are visible and easy to categorize. They're not, and this attitude leads to scenarios like random people harassing actually disabled people for using a handicapped parking spot.

My point is, like, mind your own business and don't make judgy proclamations about what disabled people can do.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago

I don't think you know what you're talking about. Disabilities are really diverse and the US at least has shit healthcare. I can totally imagine someone using the last of their strength or energy to get back into their car. I wish everyone returned their carts, too, but I have empathy for people who just hit the end of their rope.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 1 month ago

I feel pretty conflicted on this whole thing. Don't get me wrong, it's hilarious seeing Elon squirm, but it's disconcerting to see everyone cheering on government censorship of the internet.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

I mean technically I could write an interpreter that assigns semantics to HTML constructs.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Or maybe behind a keyed lock in the office? Not a keypad, a physical key.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 months ago

All I'm saying is that accessibility is not a solved problem. Disabled people still need to haul themselves to the station/stop and then to wherever they need to go. Even just riding on public transit can be more taxing in terms of keeping your body upright, fighting against inertia every time it stops and starts. Public transit can be great, but you have to admit it's less accessible than a car that comes to your door.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago

Nope, because what you're doing is copying the entire sequence, reversing it, and pairing up each element left to right. There's no way to have any leftovers because the original sequence and the new reversed sequence have the same number of elements.

A perhaps less intuitive way of thinking of it is you start with a sequence of 1 up to N, which contains exactly N elements. The sequence from 1 to N and its reverse together contain 2N elements, which is by definition an even number, regardless of whether N is even or odd. Because it's even we can break it into pairs without leftovers.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, but if humans evolved from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

0x0

joined 1 year ago