We agree on nothing, you provided a secondhand link to an obviously biased source with no actual verifiable information to support your assertions because you're incompetent, I don't need any further sources because I'm not obligated to prove a negative, the fact that you need that explained would be embarassing if you had any dignity or self-awareness
Gooner detected
It's definitionally only an ad hominem if my argument consists of personal insults/attacks. The comment you're responding to is insulting the quality of your sources, not you, and the quality of your sources is verifiably dogshit. Swing and a miss lol
I'm here to make sure any literate person who even perfunctorily skims these comments will know that you're peddling dangerous bullshit. You're welcome for nothing, you deserve worse.
And lol @ "artificial constructions" literally every single human creation is an artificial construction
Goddamn you're dumb and long-winded, reality will prove you wrong pretty soon now so just pay attention and you'll find out
Disagree, calling for the deaths of evil people is good actually, but not half as good as actually killing them
The energy can be obtained from renewable sources any time we decide to quit fucking around and make it happen, wood pulp can be replaced with hemp far more easily than that and requires less chemical treatment in the process. There are no similar options for mitigating the negative impact of mining or making our supply of those metals any bigger.
Paper is a renewable resource, rare metals used in computers aren't, and the contents of the dictionary will be the same either way
You have the political philosophy of a petulant toddlet
Good for them