[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 3 days ago

my super power is turning people into hating the monarchy

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago

the guy just hated me 😔

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 3 days ago

this is in Haifa occupied Palestine, also I got perma-banned and cancelled from a discord server for posting this image.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 days ago

why did I look it up?

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 days ago

They are worshippers of colonialism and capital

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 3 days ago

Yeah, that's their dynasty, because they believe they're related to Ali Ibn Talib

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 28 points 3 days ago

More context: The Rif people: North African Amazigh group, speaks Rif dialect of Amazigh, are Sunni Muslims.
The Rif republic: a republic that was established from 1921 unti 1924 by Al-Khattabi.
Map of the Rif region

The people of the Rif have been repressed by the monarchy and protesting for a long time, the region is mountainous which is perfect for guerilla warfare, they're on the northern coast and aren't landlocked. But, personally I don't see it going far, but they have an opportunity of taking action against zionism, doing stuff against zionist ships docking or assassinating zionist figures.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 3 days ago

North Africa: The movement for the independence of the Rif Republic makes its first summit in Algeria, some excerpts from the speaker "Juba Al-Ghdiwi":

  • We will have a visit to the pure land of the Rif republic when it is liberated from the filth of the Alawites, and this is a dream that will come true just as our ancestors achieved it more than 100 years ago.

  • The Republic of the Rif was an existing political entity that enjoyed independence before it was taken from it, which highlights the historical legitimacy and legal legitimacy of the Rif people’s demand to restore what was stolen from them.

  • The independence of the Republic of the Rif was between 1921 and 1926. It was established as the first independent republic in North Africa under the leadership of President Muhammad bin Abdul Karim al-Khattabi.

  • The Republic of the Rif was subjected to international conspiracies and the collusion of internal and external colonial powers, which led to its suppression and the return of the Rif to colonial control, and then by the Moroccan functional regime that imposed its hegemony, after the so called the independence of Morocco in 1956.

  • The independence of the Rif Republic is the restoration of a legitimate right, not a new demand, and the people of the countryside do not want secession, but rather the restoration of their right that was taken by force.

  • The Rif does not seek to separate from Morocco. Separation means that we were once part of this functional entity called Morocco, an entity created and implanted within the African body to serve the interests of the colonial powers.

  • We in the Republic of the Rif have never recognized the sovereignty of the Moroccan regime over our land, and how can we recognize a regime created by French colonialism and guaranteed its continuation through slavery agreements, most notably the protection treaty signed in 1912, according to which the Alawites handed over the Sultanate of Marrakesh to French colonialism in exchange for their remaining at the helm of power as obedient hands. In the hands of colonialism.

  • Since its inception, this entity has served, and continues to serve, external agendas at the expense of the peoples it claims to represent, which is clearly evident in its continued oppression of the people of the Rif and the people of Western Sahara.

  • Morocco and its Alawite Sultan were never on the side of the free peoples or on the side of the Rifites defending their homeland. Quite the opposite. Sultan Youssef the Alawite was an ally of the French and Spanish colonial powers against the Rifites and contributed directly to the fight against the Rif Republic, which was a symbol of dignity and freedom.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Algeria has that, but with refugees from west Africa, sometimes I see idiots repeat the same racist Fr*nch lies towards us.

[-] Aru@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 4 days ago

Right winger got arrested in Algeria upon arrival: (used google translate with some corrections)

Sansal, a puppet of the anti-Algerian revisionist movement [Arabic]

Algeria - The comical uproar raised by some French political and intellectual circles over the case of Boualem Sansal is further evidence of the existence of a “hateful” movement against Algeria. It is a lobby that does not miss any opportunity to question Algerian sovereignty.
The arrest of Boualem Sansal, the alleged intellectual revered by the French far right, has also awakened the professionals of indignation. The anti-Algerian and pro-Zionist names in Paris have risen up as one man: Eric Zemmour, Mohamed Sifaoui, Marine Le Pen, Xavier Driencourt, Valéry Pécras, Jack Lang, Nicolas Dupont-Aignan, and of course Tahar Ben Jelloun, his Moroccan friend who is recovering from sciatica from bending over to kiss the hand of his King Mohammed VI. They have all come to the forefront to defend this professional revisionist who has fallen into the trap of his own doing.

rest of the articleIt is worth noting that this spiteful lobby has had a bad week and they must be understood. First, one of their proteges, Kamel Daoud, was caught red-handed exploiting the suffering of a victim of terrorism in Algeria in order to win the Goncourt Prize. Then came the turn of their friend and genocidaire, Netanyahu, who was subjected to an international arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court. Finally, Gallimard’s other writer, Sansal, was arrested in the midst of his revisionist rampage. Incidentally, the writer Wasini Laredj had accused Sansal of plagiarizing the title and story of his novel “2084 (2084 : la fin du monde)”
Apparently, in the group of plagiarism and distortion, France Publishing has chosen its Algerian followers well.
The naturalized citizen, Eric Zemmour, in support of his "friend" Boualem Sansal, said that "the French government must demand his immediate release". As for President Macron, returning from a vacation in Brazil where he described the Haitians as "idiots" (as usual, of course!), he expressed his "deep concern". Macronist-Zionist France denounces Sansal's arrest (at Algiers airport), but it has not told the world whether it has the necessary sovereignty to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he sets foot at Charles de Gaulle airport! Since Paris speaks of law and human rights, compliance with international law in Netanyahu's case could be a good start.
France under Macron is no stranger to contradictions. This president, who speaks of “crimes against humanity” in Algeria regarding French colonialism, acknowledges the historical recognition of the state assassinations of Ali Boumendjel, Maurice Audin and Larbi Ben M’hidi, and instructs his ambassador to lay a wreath on the grave of our martyr, is the same one who defends a denier that questions the existence of Algeria, its independence, its history, its sovereignty and its borders!
Wouldn't it be more appropriate for France, which enacts memory laws every time, especially when it comes to anti-Semitism (the Gayssot Act), to condemn Sansal for trying to deny the existence of the Algerian nation? This might be a good subject for study and negotiation for Benjamin Stora!
Ultimately, with every wave of hostility against Algeria, Paris accuses Algeria of all evil, while Algeria always acts according to the principle of consistency. Accusing Algeria of blocking freedom of expression while the French are still holding Pavel Durov, founder of the Telegram application, the global platform for expression, is nothing but confirmation of this evil play, in which Sansal is only the appropriate puppet.

The article is from the Algerian Press Service, which is owned by the Algerian government, no their articles aren't like this usually.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Aru

joined 2 years ago