[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 46 points 9 months ago

Yes but a house would only cost $84,240 in todays dollars. It's all relative.

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

Year, this toilet weird af...

Problem has still not me a couple of times, but usually cause the toilet is quite small or it's the walls of the bowl, but if there's that much water in there I feel like it's overkill

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 36 points 10 months ago

They said people outside the tech industry

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Me looking at this meme nearing 40..."pretty sure we used sus and fire as teenagers".

Then again I didn't grow up in USA and we had different "hip" words.

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 130 points 10 months ago

I assume he doesn't really think that, but thinks he's being a cute troll. Like picking 420.69 for everything.

Trying to deflect assumed criticism about him by being "funny".

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 44 points 11 months ago

We don't even fully understand the brain itself, let alone how to recreate it.

This is token click bait scientific "journalism"

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Thomas Jane was also fantastic. Same with Jared Harris. Shame they couldn't secure him for later appearances, his character is great and he did the belta accent so well.

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

"what's your name?"

"achoo"

"a jew? Here?"

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Yeah this blows my mind. If you wouldn't allow a paranoid schizophrenic to hold office, why are you allowing people who think the earth is 6000 years old and dinosaurs aren't real?

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

Wait, it's she alive? The wording in the article makes it sound like she's dead.

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Conspiracy became full right wing propaganda quite a while ago. Pictures of Clinton with epstein would get a billion upvotes but there were never any ones of Trump despite him being more relevant

[-] BillyTheSkidMark@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Not to defend it, but in situations like this I think they have to be vague for legal reasons. There's a fine line between reporting the news and defamation (regardless of how true it is).

It's bullshit, and people will use defamation and lawyers to attack people accusing them. But I can see why you'd want to be extra careful how you worded the title.

view more: next ›

BillyTheSkidMark

joined 1 year ago