A liberal economist would sacrifice a child to the line god every year to get a consistent 3.3 percent growth.

exams which traditionally included highly invasive questions about your sex life, early childhood and gender presentation. Like, there’s people who’ve been asked to show off their underwear in these trials, and were then asked to jump up and down to prove they do not have a boner from wearing women’s panties

Holy fucking shit the cis are not ok.

LMAO 3 times a year? IDK, that kinda sounds like a lot.

Almost half of single men said they don't wash their bed sheets for up to four months

Alright, seems so.

You can't do this to me. I built this egg. You know how much I sacrificed!

Then I'll use it as a way to meet boys.

No, don't do use the Party as a way to meet boys.

Then I'll use it as a way to meet enbies.

... No.

Then how else am I supposed to find someone good (not stinking liberals) to adopt me

UN estimates concluded that after the current war, it will take at least a year just to clear the rubble, and between seven and 10 years to rebuild the destroyed homes, and it would take the Gaza Strip until 2092 just to restore the GDP levels of 2022, with GDP per capita and socioeconomic conditions continuously declining. However, even with the most optimistic scenario, it would still take the Gaza Strip’s GDP per capita until 2035 to return to its pre-blockade level.

source

Edit: ReliefWeb is very interesting if you want to be sad all the time. They have a lot of news about Palestine.

If you want linebreaks without paragraph breaks, add 2 spaces to the end of a line, like this:
See, new line

Two newlines makes a new paragraph.

The GA has no such power. It can discuss and recommend on a bunch of stuff, but can't enforce something like a blockade, anything that would effect things. The only body that can do that is the SC (and wouldn't you know it, that's where there is veto)

단숨에

LMAO

5. Decides to include in the provisional agenda of its seventy-ninth session the item entitled "Necessity of ending the economic, commercial and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against Cuba".

Cuba has been submitting the same document year after year since 1992.

단숨에

This is the GA, no veto power there. It's just the entire UN going "this is against the UN charter, other resolutions of the UN, etc." and the U.S. going "ok"

단숨에

Here is a not so nice thought: These people are not (necessarily) refugees.

I mean that, as defined by the 1967 protocol^1^ (which is mostly just the 1951 conventions^2^ definition, but without the time limitation). Therefore the right to non-refoulment (i.e. not returning a person to their prior country) does not apply to them. The EU has a lesser definition "subsidiary protection"^3^ which these people ~~do~~ might[?] qualify for (as it includes ~~war~~ "serious and individual threat to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict"), but as far as I can read, the directive does not define any rights for these people. So the exact things a person under subsidiary protection is afforded is up to the individual country. I am probably missing some "laws", but otherwise there is, legally as far as these "laws" go, nothing wrong, with‒e.g.‒Germany (assuming German law doesn't define non-refoulment for S.P.) returning Ukrainians to Ukraine.

^1^ https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280048bb8&clang=_en
^2^ https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=080000028003002e&clang=_en
^3^ https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32011L0095

Definition as modified by the 1967 protocol:

owing to well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country ; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it

LMAO.

Btw, for no reason, if anybody has friends in the NATO militarys, I recommend introducing them to WT.