Given his sheer laziness, my money is that he's just sitting in it until EOD.

I think that's a pitchfork.

This is literally their thinking.

They alone want to control who gets to benefit from charity. They want to be the arbiters of who is worthy of God's love and who should suffer under his might.

They can make it into an extension then.

Like Container tabs, which, of all things, should be baked into the browser.

I don't want an AI chatbot in the sidebar, but if it gives Mozilla a new, substantial source of revenue outside the Google search deal--and I can ~~disable it~~ enable it if I want to --then I'm all for it.

Ftfy

I didn't go through the entire list but this is mostly staffers. I saw a lot of former ranking members but no current, up for election members.

I'm willing to be corrected but so far, no one who has their ass on the line has actually stood up.

I'm glad there are Republicans willing to stand up against Trump, but it would mean a lot more if someone who has the monetary and political backing of the GOP actually stood up and said they are endorsing Harris.

Yes and no.

You are correct that it's never about policy.

But you get a sense of the candidate by how they respond to counter points and how they are able to pivot on the fly. Sort of like in an interview, you're asked a bunch of questions?

Same idea. It shows how prepared you were, whether you have good advisors, whether or not you need a diaper change.

Which leads me...I really want Harris, at some point in the middle of the debate, hold her finger up to her nose, like trying to pass off that she's trying to rub it but really she's blocking her nasal passages. And then in the middle of her turn say, "Oh God. I'm sorry but there is just an awful smell. Can we break for a minute and check it out? I'm worried it might be a gas leak or something."

It's actually one of the main reasons why I love mail-in voting.

And it's exactly the reason why Republicans largely don't want it. Doing "research" is antithetical to the Republican party.

I suspect this is a way for them to signal to independents that they have changed, knowing full well that their rank and file members aren't going to change anything they are doing.

I would love to see the next president prioritize using mastodon for all federal communications.

In an age where cities are getting less and less tax revenue, replanting new trees that don't fruit is often more cost effective in the long run.

And even if you did hire a crew, they aren't going to get every piece of rotted fruit. Animals, being what they are, will bury or hide them.

subscribe