[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 77 points 8 months ago

Oh damn, in German, "Vati" is an affectionate form like "daddy", except it's the word stem of "father" ("Vater").

And wouldn't you know it, Christians also use "Vater" to refer to priests, the pope and their god.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 87 points 9 months ago

Because shaking your cursor to spot it is kind of universal?

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 78 points 9 months ago

ʕ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°ʔ

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 85 points 9 months ago

It always bothers me about this whole vertical tab concept, that, on a theoretical level, I'm fully on board with what you're saying. But in practice, I'll often have Firefox tiled side-by-side with another window, and then it's painful for that sidebar to take up any space at all.

I am happy, though, that this feature is being integrated for the people that find it useful.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 81 points 10 months ago

I know it's a joke, but I do not enjoy being in the position with the stick.

Like, man, they'll sometimes check in some stupid stuff. Yesterday, I told two juniors to implement a unit test and they could use annotations like on another unit test, which I also explained.

Problem is, I had introduced that unit test a week ago and had given it an ignored-annotation, to document that that's currently broken.
And you guessed it, they copied that ignored-annotation, too, complete with the comment "//TODO currently broken". The test they implemented was not run, not even once.

And like, what the fuck do I do with that? Sure enough, it was a miscommunication, I'll try to be clearer next time.
But I'd also really like to explain to them whatever information they were missing, if they were missing any. Like, did they not know what the ignored-annotation does? Did they not think at all and just verbatim copied everything?

And then the problem is, this is kind of so dumb, that even just bringing it up is going to be embarassing for them. It's already me beating them with a stick.
I'd much rather praise them when they do something well, but this is so hard to spot when just reading over committed code. All the obstacles they cleared are not visible in there.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 78 points 1 year ago

Good thing that this isn't actually possible...

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To my knowledge, we also have zero evidence that they didn't exist. Nor have we ever observed matter/energy appearing out of ~~thin air~~ vaccuum, so it seems unlikely to me.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 year ago

This question actually came from another dude, but similar energy: I have a deep voice, so they asked, if it's relaxing to feel those bass vibrations in my body whenever I talk.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 82 points 1 year ago

Have they considered submerging the spacecraft, to see where the bubbles come out? 🙃

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 year ago

I once had a colleague who was raised to live by the bible, never questioning it. He was also a massive shitposter. No matter what dumb shit he said, he'd always say that it was just a joke.

Well, one of the few times when I genuinely caught him off guard, was when I explained that science did not actually claim to know the one and only truth. That it wanted to be proven wrong.

I think, that idea itself conflicted with his whole world view. Like, I imagine, his parents also raised him to never question their authority.

[-] Ephera@lemmy.ml 87 points 1 year ago

Nevermind using such frivolous things as a file system.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Ephera

joined 5 years ago