[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

If you couldnt find it in the control panel before, you sure as shit cant find it now.

Oh you've tried this new AI Agent that can change the settings for you, have you?

Bullshit to all those points.

Which points are "bullshit"? That they're slowly moving everything out of the control panel to the settings app? This is literally what they've been telling us they're doing, and what we've seen them do.

That they still have the control panel? Nope, not bullshit, it's still there.

That being able to ask Copilot to change a setting would be helpful? How is that bullshit?

I do NOT need voice activation

Good thing it's not MANDATORY then. You can keep using your mouse and keyboard. Also you don't have to use your VOICE for copilot - it's much easier to use the mouse and keyboard. That's how most people use it.

Also, they’ve been “slowly” transitioning for over two years, wtf? We waiting for the next OS at this point?

This stuff takes time unfortunately. If they change everything at once they get even more anger and pushback. This way it's just a slow and easy move away from the control panel - 1 thing here, 2 things there, and before you know it hey look! Everything is in the settings app now!

Oh good mum joke big fella! So clever and badarse.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

Edited to add: Yeah, see reply, they just keep going. “If being transphobic makes me a transphobe then words have lost meaning” is… Well, something.

Acknowledging that males and females are different makes someone transphobic in your mind, does it?

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

Court records show it's not.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Illegal immigrants who were determined to be MS13 gang members were deported and you’re claiming death camps lol

I can’t believe you guys actually believe this stuff you’re writing. It’s got to just be reading the party approved talking points manual and parroting their arguments.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

You’re a trans man, according to yourself. Or did you lie?

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

Awesome, so you can't provide a single fascist policy.

Thanks!

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

Irrelevant. Windows 11 is well over 50% of respondents on the steam survey, has been since late last year iirc. Windows 11 is the best Windows OS, and arguably PC OS, there has ever been. People are not getting fed up with it or moving away to Linux. Factually they just aren’t.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My name was randomly generated. Also “injustice” isn’t really applicable here, at least not yet.

Double jeopardy doesn’t work like this. Nothing is stopping him defending himself. The jury issue is real, but in his favour thanks to the left trying to make a murder it to be a hero.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

This is a complete false equivalence and I feel that you know that. The idea of a console is to expand it by buying new games. That’s not unexpected.

It's not though. The idea of self hosting isn't to not have any software costs associated with it. Domain names aren't free. VPNs (that you use to aquire content) aren't free. Cloud backups aren't free. Would you prefer everything was free? Absolutely. Do you sometimes have to pay to get the best software for the job? Absolutely, and Plex is that software.

I am a software developer.

Same here! That makes your argument even crazier to me! Someone demanding that your software should be free and should never be changed to be paid even if it means the company goes under is bananas.

The argument is that this is an exceptionally poor business model and as a developer I’m disgusted that people are defending it.

The business model of having the people that use their main product that requires the most development and time and resources, Plex Server, pay either a cheap one off fee (that regularly goes on sale for half price) or a monthly subscription fee in order to use it, is "exceptionally poor"? How so? Is it just that it was free? This business model has been around for eternity. Get people in the door and hooked by offering it for free, then start charging for it. It's one of the actual best business models around, not "exceptionally poor" lol. You're looking at it from the "I want it to be free forever" point of view, not the "We need it to be a viable business with revenue to be able to sustain it" point of view.

until there’s no such thing as free software anymore.

That will never happen, because people will always be making free software to put out there for people to try and to use - and many of them will then transition to PAID because it's not sustainable otherwise. For software to thrive you often have to have full time developers working on it, and full time developers need to be paid.

At the end of the day you’re paying twice to avoid buying IP. Just fucking buy the IP if you’re going to be stupid. Movies are like $12. At $250 you’re paying $2.10/mo in addition to your hosting costs.

Just go buy 20 movies for the same price. It’s so dumb.

I paid ~$100 ~10 years ago for Plex Pass. It paid for itself instantly as I was simply supporting the developers of the software. As a software developer I have no problem doing that. I wasn't forced to buy it, but I did.

I'm not quite sure where you got this $250 figure from though? What is that, the monthly remote pass x 12? Also most people running a plex server get far more than 20 movies a year lol. Pretty sure I got 20 movies last night.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What you define as trolling is apparently very different to what actual trolling is.

Why does almost every “progressive” think that anyone saying things they disagree with is “trolling”? Genuine question. Is it because you can’t fathom anyone not sharing the same views as you, so you think that they must be deliberately saying argumentative arguments to try and get a reaction?

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

What we call "JoUrNaLiStS" these days are nothing more than activists most of the time, as is evident by whoever wrote this article and whoever ok'd it for publication, especially without publishing the comments that they specifically reached out to Tesla's board to get.

In this situation you can either believe:

a) Unsubstantiated rumours, with zero evidence supplied, zero sources, from a "JoUrNaLiSt" who tried to verify the story and then refused to acknowledge and publish the fact that the rumour was denied.

b) the board, who the rumour is about, flat out denying the rumour.

I choose to believe the one that isn't just reporting rumours based on zero evidence that have been categorically denied. You choose the other option, which is up to you, but it makes your decision making skills look very dubious. You seem very much in the "guilty until proven innocent" category, because that's essentially what you're saying here - you're asking someone to prove a negative, and even when they say they aren't doing it you then don't believe them?

Many would argue that Tesla's stock price would go UP if this rumour was true, so saying that their stock price depends on them denying it is questionable.

We don't want Murdoch back btw.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 1 week ago

So you will believe a rumour based on nothing but won't believe the board of directors denying said rumour unless they sue? What kind of crazy mindset is that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

FreedomAdvocate

joined 2 weeks ago