NCD is so noncredible that it overflowed back to prophetic: https://old.reddit.com/r/NonCredibleDefense/comments/zp6b78/hamas_paragliders/ lol

If people were really good at removing that info, they'd probably create a unique hash including all that data that we wouldn't be able to edit.

You can't just collect and analyse the data either, you have to write a kickass paper, design an appealing poster and present it like it's the best thing ever and the respective talk...oh yea and then you have to write tons of kickass proposals to get the funding to do more experiments to collect more data and analyse it and... :)

Alright, how much is the patch going to impact performance?

As noted earlier, GPU.zip works only when the malicious attacker website is loaded into Chrome or Edge. The reason: For the attack to work, the browser must:

allow cross-origin iframes to be loaded with cookies

allow rendering SVG filters on iframes and delegate rendering tasks to the GPU

~~Does Firefox do that?~~

Also annoying: you can't leave the house without your tracking device anymore :/

One of the advantages of lemmy is the transparent modlog, where I see a) lots of thankless work mods perform I assume for free b) 99.99% bullshit that is not constructive in a public forum. I'm adjusting my expectations about the false positive removal rate considering how much useless comments get through.

That's because every liberty is somebody else's constraint. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_France

The French concept of religious freedom did not grow out of an existing pluralism of religions but has its roots in a history with Roman Catholicism as the single official religion and including centuries of persecution of people not endorsing it, or straying from the most official line, from the Cathars to the Huguenots and the Jansenists – this lasted until the French Revolution.

French insistence on the lack of religion in all things public (laïcité or secularism) is a notable feature in the French ideal of citizenship. This concept of secularism, also plays a role in ongoing discussions about the wearing of scarves by Muslim women in public schools. In 2004, the French Parliament passed a law prohibiting the wearing of ostentatious religious garb in public primary and secondary schools; motivations included the tradition of keeping religious and political debates and proselytism out of such schools, as well as the preservation of the freedom of Muslim female students forced to wear certain costumes out of peer pressure.

Yea, I checked worldnews today: there are these bot-like irrelevant comments on major subs, small subs abandoned...askhistorians is a little slow...maybe people are just on holiday having fun and such :D, is instagram full of holiday bragging?

Ok, fine, at least you're consistent.

Look, it's just trashy 4chan+r/the_Donald talk, but ok, use it to your heart's content if it means that much to you and holds such expressive value to you, we're all adults here and I'll just stop reading :) have a nice day.

Órban still has fond memories of that...he was 7 in 1956, he probably remembers.

This is such a stupid distraction 😖 less, please.