Maybe if you start heating your homes by burning car tires in your gardens. But otherwise, no. You are already so far behind the curve that economics really don't allow CO2 emission increases on a global significant level.
The world is not just the USA...
Comparing users to MAU seems disingenuous. The fediverse has ~12 million users, according to fedidb and around 1.1 million active ones.
Most of them on Mastodon.
I am talking about Austria. Its mostly reusable ones made of fabric, or really sturdy plastic/wofen plastic. If you need a oneway one it's paper. We anyway had to pay for the shoppingbags as long as I can remember.
Thanks for the answer. I was really surprised how little people complained when the shop ones stopped existing. Seems like induced demand. Back then I kept a few, because they are so handy. Well, never used one.
It will take some time but I will answer with sources. Can you post the source used in the map i have never been able to find anything that came close.
TECHNOLOGIEOFFENHEIT!1!!!!!!1
Wir wissen alle was ihr macht...
Yes for Sulfur derivates and nitrous oxigens but no for CO2. The biggest contributord to CO2 emissions are electricity production and traffic.
Its really easy to find this sources but I really dont know what you want to know. Maybe about being expensive? Slow?. There is literally tons of material out there... The other guy took the one thing that could maybe be argued about, CO2 emissions.
I think both. But either way, I am fine.
Hugohase
joined 1 year ago
Those data centers would soon be somewhere else due to... economics. And even if not, wouldn't be significant.