[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Agree with you, OsmAnd is practically unusable for me due to the ancient UI. I hated it every time I used it.

I found Organic Maps to be a decent modern alternative. It's open source and uses data from openstreetmaps as well, but it's a million times less cluttered.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Doesn't Twitter directly suppress such links? I remember there was a crackdown on people linking their mastodon accounts a while back.

And external links in general get a huge suppression in the algorithm because Twitter does not want to recommend tweets that take you off the site.

The platform actively fights you if you want to move elsewhere (which should really be a telltale sign for you to move), so I get why some orgs struggle with that decision. Doubly so if your job relies on the platform's outreach.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

As a European myself, never mention the Romani people to anyone here unless you want to hear the most degenerate, racist diatribe you can conjure up in your mind. (half hyperbole half not)

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. In most European countries even small parties can get seats. In my country there are 8 parties in parliament, for example, and 2 of them didn't use to be there 2 election cycles ago (they were too small/new 8 years ago but eventually grew in popularity and got enough votes for representation).

Of course if they only have 1 or 2 members in parliament they typcily tend to form coalitions with other like-minded parties so they can get more voting power.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a shame that this law still doesn't apply to YouTube

If Germany is anything like Canada and other countries, applying public broadcast laws to YouTube would be a monkey's paw deal. Sure you might get tighter control over advertising, but youtube would also be forced to do things like show you x% of content made in your country/language, resulting in state mandated control of the content you see online and potentially limiting/warping international audiences for content creators, and potentially other ramifications I'm not considering.

Now if they made a law specifically for youtube and other online video platforms that dealt with advertising in that context, that would be a different story.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

Or just buy whatever TV you want, never connect it to the internet, and then plug in a separate box where you'll actually get the content from.

Smart TVs aren't actually that smart if they have no internet and you entirely bypass their home screen to go straight to whatever box you have.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

It means that the forced arbitration provisions do not apply to you if you're in the EU, so you can still sue them by other means and with people not paid by them.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While not the same, there are similar ideas out there for the regular consumer that aren't as absurd.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The other ranks just mean someone you wouldn't mind winning too, more or less. You're ranking from favorite to least favorite.

Your favorite is number 1 but if you had to pick another one it'd be number 2, and if you had to pick another one it'd be number 3, etc.

The idea is that as you go down there might actually be candidates with considerable overlap between all the voters, and that also gives chances to more than just 2 people. 3rd parties would actually have some viability in this system.

Here's a quick example: 50% of voters put candidate A as their number 1 choice and the other 50% but candidate B as their number 1 choice. But out of the totality, 70% put candidate C as their second choice. In a ranked voting system C would win even though it wasn't the favorite of either, because it was the candidate a big majority was willing to compromise with.

Of course in reality how the choices are tallied varies and it's not that simple but I hope I managed to illustrate the point.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At least for romance languages, there is a rhyme and reason for the gender each noun gets, so neologisms and borrowed words tend to follow the same logic.

For word morphology, as an example, in Portuguese nouns ending in a are almost always female, so new words that end with a are very likely to be female.

There are semantic rules too, for example brands and companies are typically (I want to say always but there's probably edge cases) female, so even though Netflix and Amazon didn't exist before they're still female.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No. He's just stopping weekly uploads. He'll still upload on an irregular basis.

[-] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 years ago

Remember duet? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

IdleSheep

joined 2 years ago