Test it as an airburst over the entity

Was it him or Bob Ross who was a sniper in Vietnam?

Lemme guess, this is the one time a landlord ever forgot to jack up the rent

How the fuck did workers clean those things?

Cold War 2:

Soviet Union 2, 3, and 4:

Felony for five eggs containing a combined 7 grams of weed.

Taxpayers paying $65,000+ a year for several years to jail a guy giving away a substance legally available to purchase a few hundred km away...for at most 20 people-hours of stoned time.

There is no component of "AI" that doesn't stack the deck against the proletariat. Look at the most common use cases:

• Image / video generation: used to circumvent the need to hire artists, designers, and photographers disposable and to dump successful ones back into the reserve army of labor.
• Code generation: used to make software developers more disposable and to reduce the salaries of some of the only well paid proletarians.
• Text generation: used to manipulate public opinion, present ideas as originating from individuals or grassroots efforts, and frustrate any conversations that threaten your investments. Eventually, this scope will expand to creating shitty replacements for any worker whose primary job is to interface with others via natural language. i.e. therapists, doctors, consultants, and experts of any kind.

"AI" is exclusively a threat to the proletariat. The potential use cases used to sell it will never come to fruition because it doesn't benefit those paying to deploy "AI" systems.

Unless the machine learning project comes from an AES state, you will never see "AI" to detect cancer, assist people with disabilities, or reduce the cost of anything sold to consumers. Those use cases will die in academic journals, never to hit the market.

LLM projects are currently being provided at a loss to end users to make them indisposable to the workflows of their users. Like with social media, once the market penetration is near universal, LLM and other "AI" services will be exclusively used as either spyware or adware or require ever increasing subscription fees.

Anyone excited by "AI" systems is either bourgeois or a rube who doesn't understand that the benefits will be systematically used to eliminate what little influence they can exert over bourgeois society. At best, these systems will become marginally better or more useful internet comment regurgitation machines. At worst, AGI will be built to fit the needs of a class that seeks to enslave us all, at which point subjugation will be total and unavoidable.

We must make sure an AES state (i.e. China) leads in artificial intelligence.

President Xi says mandatory backshots

"Yeah, I'm into K-Pop"

"The pope? How many divisions he got?"

• Papa Joe

Why do people here always have to lathe the worst shit into existence?

Federal operation to ruin the SEO of our official podcast and associate it with cranks