The US bombed a sovereign nation, does that not constitute an act of war, regardless of the target?
Okay, I have a hypothetical question for you:
If the US Congress moved to stop Trump from escalating conflict in Iran, should the bombing of enrichment sites be considered less of an act of war than bombing reactors?
Oh yeah. The cracks were there in the earlier scenes with Lucy, but definitely became stark after what happened with Sophie.
spoilers
Did you notice how rarely Pascal's scenes had him close to Johnson / had shots where he was directly facing the camera until the end? And how usually there was something between them, usually something expensive.
Watching how scenes were shot with Evans in contrast, they felt more vulnerable and intimate. Seeing John at low points and struggling. I mean, I could tell how the film would go, given the genre, but I felt the juxtaposition was deliberate and well done. However, it made it feel like Evans' character was given more pathos and depth when Pascal's character wasn't given the same chance for connection.
I'm glad Johnson dropped the cynical calculus, and even then, I appreciate that she was aware of where her concerns around money came from. It wasn't about luxury or vanity, but as a way to be protected from the harsh realities of love.
I was surprised they went there about SA in the film, but given the way people can be objectified and mistreated in something like connections through matchmaking, I think they portrayed the events well.
I went into the movie blind, but I had a good time. I too wish we got more into Pascal's head, but as I wrote above, I think I know why we didn't.
I wish there were more discussions around the intersection of race, sexual orientation, and gender expression, but I think the scenes of Johnson talking to her clients was brutally honest about the way dating is lopsided against people who aren't white, straight, and attractive.
Oh yeah, it's been such a long time that I would be happy to know how he's doing. But I'm going to proceed carefully either way. Thank you, comrade.
Thanks, it's something I think about, but it's the first time I've felt comfortable thinking about my feelings in a nonjudgmental way.
I'm glad it helps, and I hope you're coping okay 
Loss is so hard and it hits differently each time. I'm sorry about your coworker. I'm glad you have a partner you can lean on. It doesn't feel like a good time for me to share, but I would like to think I would try hold space if something in the past is eating at my partner. Thank you for reading my post.
Fictional evil characters are extremely popular in media.
Jack O'Connell is a talented, conventionally attractive man and his character was powerful, charismatic, and compelling.
He was supernaturally evil and that evil wasn't tied to him being Irish. He was depicted as more sympathetic than the KKK who sought to kill out of hate instead of a supernatural compulsion.
You must pray for the war criminals.
(when he had COVID)
The note taking app? Yeah
Lavender
joined 2 months ago
This was the comment you corrected in regards to concerns about a potential world war. If you believe bombing nuclear sites is less of an escalation than bombing nuclear reactors, that's fine, but focusing on the inaccuracy didn't respond to the original concern and intended point - that killing a general is different from targeting three nuclear sites.
If the comment was corrected to read
Would their original point be any different?
That's why I described your response as splitting hairs. Instead of engaging with their point, you corrected a detail that didn't significantly change their concern about escalation of an international conflict.