45
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
258
23
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
42
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
110
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/canada@lemmy.ca
69
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/canada@lemmy.ca
28
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
63
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
23
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
63
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
23
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
28
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

While U.S. officials have been open about their intentions of using Ukraine to weaken Russia, they have been careful about claiming that they are making hardheaded geopolitical calculations. Typically, U.S. officials have remained sensitive to the Ukrainian position that the war is a matter of resisting Russia’s military occupation, especially given that so many Ukrainians have died fighting in the war.

When O’Brien spoke to a Senate committee on October 25, he provided a blunter explanation of U.S. goals. Not only did he portray the war as “a very good bargain” for the United States, citing the fact that “Ukrainians are paying the bulk of the cost” by doing nearly all the fighting, but he also described it as an opportunity for the United States to achieve major geopolitical objectives, ones he indicated were “incredibly exciting.”

view more: ‹ prev next ›

NightOwl

joined 1 year ago