I'm lost. What's the problem with ArriveCan? The last time I heard people complaining about it was years ago because they were upset about their freedumb to be plague rats.

Literally the average experience working with ML tools. All of it feels so hacked together and barely functional.

I meant what edition, and I mean what I said. Group policy, registry keys, or scripts/programs that remove it ala shut up 10.

It means they are transgender and possibly non-binary and identify as more masculine than feminine. So they are closer to "guy" than "girl" (but might identify as neither).

Rust simply doesn't allow you to have references to data that goes out of scope (unless previously mentioned hoops are jumped through such as an explicitly declared unsafe block). It's checked at compile time. You will never be able to compile the program.

Rust isn't C. Rust isn't C++. The memory-safe-ness of it is also not magic, it's a series of checks in the compiler.

Nice breasts

Hell the comedown on my Vyvanse was brutal and that was only 20mg oral. Awful anxiety until like 2 months in.

It hallucinated parameters

Sound like LLMs to me. This is not going to stop being a problem. This is the fundamental problem with LLMs - they are text prediction algorithms and have no comprehension of their output.

It's honestly surprising me how many Canadians are here. And if you're not, well, not many Americans can name British Columbia off of BC.

Laws don't do anything. Experiments have proven that time and time again the only thing that changes drivers' behaviour is infrastructure. Have you ever seen a speed sign change, but nobody slows down because the road is so wide they feel it doesn't matter?

Narrow roads. Raise crosswalks. Grade separated bike paths. These are the things that actually keep people safe. Something something the Netherlands.

There is one exception: I do think PEVs should be limited to 25-30km/h. As someone with an ebike I know peoe vastly overestimate their own handling abilities, and it's very bad at speeds above that. But because that's a law for the manufacturer, it means that people don't have to do any thinking to comply with it.

There hasn't been enough progression in hardware. It isn't the 2000s anymore. If they release something soon, even within the next couple years, it will perform even worse than the PS5.