Must be noted, (not to doom about it, that's not my takeaway either from this) allegedly from CNN polling, 41% of Americans approve of this (at least in the under-34 demographic this falls to 29%).

Not to overly give credence to such polls, and there's likely selection bias among other things (as well as the general ignorance and learned apathy of the populace). It sounds not far off from reality coming from another western country, though. Not to mention that most of the "disapproval" is surely just because of the economic fallout and that Iran actually can defend itself.

As with reactions to the genocide in Palestine, as with many other things, I find myself often wondering - how are we supposed to live with these people? How can the rest of humanity coexist with these people who are of the same stock mentality as that of the Zionists (who inspired the Zionists, Nazis, and countless other fascist or otherwise imperialist and settler-genocidal movements)?

Even with education many will still hold onto their blood money/colonial arrogance, and constantly grasp for more. There's clear social progress (and I am optimistic for it and even more so, for the development of the south not being restrained by the brainworms and rabid temperament of the west), but it seems the bulk of it will be through the natural course of older generations dying out.

In the end I imagine (for all he too was a genocidaire), Lincoln's take on the US civil war seems to be right, for the whole of the west... "every drop of blood by the lash (of settler-colonialism, imperialism, etc) may be repaid with another drawn by the sword." One would hope not (though it'd fully self inflicted, and better than the status quo, for all that the west could bleed itself completely dry and still not have repaid in full) and that the we- those in the west that is- can choose a better path for all, but anyone with sense knows that won't be the case, not until every other possibility is exhausted through blood.

TL,DR is unlimited Hiroshima-Nagasakis on the ""free world,"" and 100 cultural revolutions would still not be enough to reform the west..

Now you've gone and got me excited for the parade of all things.

Someone float that idea to him quick

Doubt, but whatever brings us closer to a hypothetical radlib Jan 6 is probably cool by my books.

TBF I was probably about as obnoxious with it as I can be about anything, but indeed. Panda persecution is so real

He should imitate Abe and go all-in on the moonies cult too, lol

Even in his final moments, his beautiful revolutionary spirit shone through.

10000% agreed. They don't understand the neverending string of holocausts after holocausts the west inflicts particularly on Muslims, indigenous peoples (and what they back against those in Latin America is even worse than in the north, too- full on death squads), upon Africa, what they have inflicted in living memory (60s, 70s, 80s) and want to return to inflicting on east and southeast and south Asia.

I must admit, while it would be terrible and things should not go that far (unless it's MAD, then let the punishment of the heavens spew radioactive shit all over the Great Satan), if only they knew what it's like. YanKKKeestan and the west will either have to learn empathy or the rest of humanity will inevitably be driven to the point of wiping them out in complete and utter self-defense.

Too robust, gotta get that emaciated hillbilly look

Honestly I'm gay but he's fine AF

There you go, burgering it up. Anyone else without the burger-brain worms can get exactly what I mean.

That's stooping to an asinine level that is ascribing "the west" to all these working and lumpen victims, many of which are LITERALLY COLONIZED PEOPLE

Way to put words in my mouth there. As someone who is also exactly what you describe (lumpen colonized POC). But yes, surely, the wholesome chungus settler-imperial core is wholly devoid of responsibility and people pointing out the hypocrisy is the height of misanthropy and psychopathy, and any humor or irony found in such a situation is unequivocally directed towards the most innocent BIPOC babies and apolitical lumpen rather than the broader society and global inequalities as a whole, and even pointing it out or having the sentiment is the equivalent of a little genocide. Didn't'cha know, when you say "mag bar Amrika" there's a little black, indigenous USAmerican baby that falls right down dead.

It's fucked up burgers have these pretentious and self-righteous expectations of infinite virtue, respect, and placidity from the rest of the world, but start crying foul and malding when their society is called to task for not doing the same (rather the opposite). It's especially fucked up to take great lengths to try to defend it. It is insular Americacentrism, cartoonish levels of uncharitable extrapolation (so as to find perceived slight) and disproportionate reaction, a dismissiveness of the global context of inequality and exploitation by the imperial cores, and an unqualified and arbitrary absolution with no rooting in reality of the broader societal guilt within colonial society done through said uncharitable extrapolations.

(Do you really think any meaningful percentage of these victims too poor to leave the regions facing mass-death from capitalism's destruction of the planet are the same people you see on Twitter being fascist?)

Once again, where did I say that? I said it shouldn't be celebrated. But no, people finding humor or irony in the tables turning, not being bottomless wells of empathy and infinite tolerance for the broader context of western-characteristic selectivism, or not personally laying down and mourning YanKKKee disasters (to which there is almost always no reciprocity) is not some "unlimited genocide on AmeriKKKans" or whatever you seem to think it is (do you really think that any meaningful or sensible interpretation of what I said, or of what is being said in this thread- rather than what is being referred to with vague accusatory gestures, is the same as calling for or mocking the death of all the poorest and disenfranchised in Burgerstan?) and is, as I said in my original post, truly an issue of blundering about with no societal or contextual self-awareness and yet paper-thin skin.

Sometimes the owner is also a rabid dog, tbh. And sometimes the owner's family is just a bunch of deeply inbred, rabid dogs.

It's rabid dogs all the way down. The community will have to take out all the rabid dogs, not just the smallest and stinkiest of the bunch, otherwise the rabid dogs will just keep inbreeding and further inbreeding...