I explained myself. You're just being intentionally obtuse in an effort to distance yourself from the propaganda and misinformation you're intentionally spreading.

You don't need to state something outright for it to be apparent. Your actions speak for themselves.

You post a lot here. You clearly know what's happening in Northern Gaza. You know the Israelis have closed off the whole area and have started massacring everyone they see. You may have even seen some of the videos circulating online of entire families being burned alive in the attacks, children too. You know Israel has a proven track record of intentionally targeting civilians and other protected groups under UN law like journalists. You also know that the IDF has been known to lie and fabricate evidence in a very pathetic attempt to justify their ongoing war crimes. So, with you knowing all this, you're really trying to post something like this and say it's all in good faith?

You would argue that you're supporting "both sides" of the conflict when one side has a documented history of misinformation and redirection to openly commit war crimes?

Yes, and I don't care about the opinions of such people any longer. They process the harms being done in the world into a sense of entitlement that everyone should deal with that in the way they do, which is principally by finding a way to rationalise those harms as inevitable.

I don't think Arabs in America care anymore. This past year has made it very evident US politicians don't actually care about human rights or the lives of Arabs all too much. They're just numb to it all.

A 1:22 target-to-civilian ratio is not proportional. No matter how you rationalize who the target is. This argument is not a valid justification.

I'd guess that there are probably going to be investigations, stuff like murder or rape. I don't expect that you're going to have the people here found to have acted inappropriately, though.

How many investigations have you heard of personally? Is the absence of a guilty verdict from a terrorist-state on its own soldiers what's allowing you to say there are no war crimes going on and America should continue selling weapons?

And in what way do you deem this attack proportional or the civilians killed as collateral? They targeted a Hezbollah politician, NOT a combatant mind you. Missed. And killed 22 and injured 122 civilians. This was in no way shape or form proportional or necessary even had they killed him.

Also, note the next paragraph:

States have an obligation to investigate all allegations of wilful killings or murders of civilians committed by their armed forces or nationals, or committed on their territory. Where there is sufficient evidence of the commission of the offence, States have a duty to prosecute those responsible. A State responsible for such violations must make full reparation for the loss suffered.

Of the 42,000+ murdered civilians in Gaza and the several thousand murdered civilians in Lebanon. How many investigations has the IDF done to follow UN humanitarian law? Or the US for that matter?

Biden leaving the office right as he's creating a whole new regional war because of that sweet AIPAC money.

He's the biggest recipient of lobbying money by Pro-Israeli groups out of any Senator in history. He's going to create a whole new generational conflict in the Middle East for some extra cash.

Israel has always been genocidal. Biden is just the biggest enabler of their actions of any US president in history.

Removing Hezbollah is only a priority because they've been a thorn in Israel's side for decades. This is their attempt to weaken Lebanon for a complete takeover. Lebanon will become the new Palestine when that happens.

The bodies aren't even cold....