I'm not arguing either of these points, I'm just pointing out that all NYT is saying here is that US officials have always believed that Russia wants this war to stay contained to Ukraine. Not that they think Russia didn't want this war or that Russia doesn't have other interests it will pursue external to this war.
All I'm saying is NYT didn't really reveal anything here.
I'm not trying to get flamed as a lib here, but there's a gulf of difference between "not wanting to expand the war" and "having no further ambition once the war is over"
the first sound plan I've seen on here
Ya but like 2-3 sheets instead of who-knows-how-much for wiping.
Finally, some good fucking [regulations on predatory games]
Asking someone not to dox you is not gatekeeping
shaving your head is a one-step aging neutralizer. You will be of indeterminate age from 28-60, depending on skincare and genetics
To be fair, they probably meant "this year, you reached 915 days with us"
If he was purely expressing emotional vulnerability about the loss of his uncle in an otherwise nonadversarial conversation, probably.
If the context included anything about war, politics, military, or even just anything other than his mourning the loss of a family member, heck no.
That's all fair, but framing the sequence of events as entirely unilateral action by the AfD is just as slanted as the article, and we're better than that.
Probably a key piece of context is that they were invited
great comment, even