Economic growth is optimized by beginning a proxy war with China.

But where? Taiwan seems the obvious candidate. Not sure if that would really lead to (quaterly) economic growth though.

How does crossplay in shooters work?
are controllers genuinely competetive to mouse and keyboard?

Remnant 2 seems to be cooperative? So at worst console / controller players are less of a help?

what's the difference between box86 and FEX-Emu?

Firefox will most likely support this, if it doesn’t want to get cut off from most of the web.

well, if more people used Firefox websites couldn't just throw them under the bus, which is why I said it's so important.
We'll have to see, but I'd hope Firefox puts up at least some resistance.

depends how the loans worked.
I was assuming his majority shares of X (ex Twitter) collateral.
And that that he could just go "yeah, go on, collect on your collateral, I don't mind", because it's not worth anything anymore.

But admittedly I have no Idea how the contracts were drawn up, if this is possible and if his other money would be available to collect on.

They are not donating, if I remember correctly fairly recently Microsoft outbid them and bing was default for a bit.

But maybe I'm not remembering correctly tbh.

Hijacking this ('cause I'm a Pirate!), is anyone working on making Diablo IV offline a thing?

while I referenced DVD on the top end, I was assuming Blue Ray for the game fyi.
not sure how big the game is, but rather sure it fits in <4 Blue Rays.

I think for USB drives and micro SD the durability is terrible (like trying to read it after 5 years has a 10% failure rate, No Idea about the stat, just to illustrate)

Nobody’s saying that, in terms of user bases, the Fediverse is comparable to Facebook or Instagram

Well, maybe I got the wrong impression, but I felt like the userbase of the fediverse was implied as the motivation for Meta federating.
And I wanted to put in a comparison, why I don't think that this is the case.

I don't see a reason why Meta should want Threads to federate, except for "well, whatever, doesn't hurt us to get those fractions of a percent". They'll probably have to use whitelists anyway, due to different legal situations on different instances. So at best they'll federate with some of the bigger instances.

Most of us have been on Facebook or Reddit and have given up on those bigger communities and adopted the Fediverse because it aligns with our values and privacy principles.

I'm sorry to tell you, but your privacy isn't exactly great here.
Every Thread, Comment and Upvote at least can be requested from any fediverse instance.
And do you know what, you don't even have to be a fediverse instance yourself to do that.
But I guess you knew that, so you're here because nobody tracks what you look at, which is great, and because you like Open Source.
That's not going to Change when Meta Federates.

Facebook does not. Its Fediverse platform will not suddenly be the opposite of what the company has been doing for more than a decade.

That's true.
But it will be two things, if I may steal the analogy of someone else in this thread:
first it will be a black hole ripping through the Fediverse.
I'd like that to do as little damage as possible.
I'd love it if mastodon continues to grow after Metas release, and doesn't collapse under server costs, Spam and other detrimental effects.
For that, preparing for the coming storm seems useful.

second it will be a huge amount of possible connections, of people.
I'd love to be able to toot a reply to some meta thread.
I mean, wouldn't it be nice if the fediverse would already know certain rules that meta may require to federate with them? And I mean sensible rules, like no/flagged porn, issues with piracy etc.
One could also talk about how Meta allows/blocks instances. A lot of legal trouble for Meta could probably be avoided if they only show posts from a whitelist of instances, but any user could post to their instance.
But how would they deal with non-whitelisted instances trying to pull Threads-Content?
Maybe they want to talk about how to deal with those "half-federating" situations, because this is not the current norm, and they may not actually get more bad press when a meeting could have prevented it.

For both of these effects I think communication with meta can only help.

a niche group of old people yelling at clouds, not willing to get with the times and join the instance that has all the content, all the users and all the new tech improvements.

I feel like this already describes us pretty darn well.
So I don't see the disadvantage to potentially going back here.

People don’t create private instances or join smaller communities for their email provider, they go to gmail, hotmai or even protonmail for the promise of stability, safety and compatibility with others, not getting listed as spam bots or their mail going straight into trash.

you mean like the 89.5% of active users of kbin being on kbin.social or 50% of active lemmy users being on lemmy.ml, lemmy.world or beehaw.org?
That's just normal, and as long as it's still possible to create smaller communities it's fine.

you wouldn't even relly need to find one consistent way, just identify the way servers do it, and have a list of supported methods.

let's say there are implenetations a,b,c, and d
if let's say google supported b,c and d, and apple b, and hotmal c and d, only hotmail-apple traffic would be unencrypted as they can't agree on a common method.

pretty sure that's how TLS (i.e. https) works.

Is scaling the server a largely financial issue, or not? @nutomic@lemmy.ml

could you reasonably confidently say that you could 10x the amount of users for something like 1000$/mo on liberapay?
If so, would you mind setting a "goalpost" for the community to help lift the financial burden?