Hehe, I can be more explicit: why would Chromium "resist" MV3 when the Chromium developers are the ones pushing it?
The spirit of Christmas future.
Also, you can manage your profiles at about:profiles
.
Not OP, but for me, the main benefit is how uneventful major distro upgrades are. Yesterday I updated to Fedora 39, and it was so anticlimactic to reboot and then be like: is it over? But that was really all there was to it.
Same for translations btw, Firefox didn't have built-in translations for a while because Mozilla had to painstakingly work on a research project to figure out how to do translation locally, on your machine, without sharing the page you're looking at with an external server.
It’s not dangerous at all, superheating is rarely a thing and you can avoid it in a multitude of ways including slapping a spoon in your cup
Ah, so I should just put my metal teaspoon in my cup and I'll be fine?
(Don't put metal in the microwave.)
My guess would be that it's one less hole that water/dust can get in?
Hehe thanks, I'm not a fan of watching videos, but I understand you don't feel like rehashing the points here either :)
Would be helpful if you could share why he was against that idea.
If you've tried all other things, you can try to refresh Firefox. It's the nuclear option in that it will remove your customisations, but is likely to resolve issues potentially caused by them.
I am sceptical that breakage was deliberate. An unfortunate side-effect of something else in a trade-off that Mozilla deemed worth it, maybe.
I mean, depending on what you mean by "purposely", I just think there's no good way in general to determine the exact worth of the use of a trademark.
Since the Corporation was founded on August 3, 2005 - this might've been the reason? Before the Corporation existed, the Foundation had to receive the money from the search engine providers directly (and the "tax reserve fund" sounds like creative accounting to hold on to that money, potentially leading to the audit), whereas later, the Corporation could hold on to it and pay taxes over it like a regular corporation does.
I'm with you here, and I'm not saying that the ratio CEO pay:employee pay is a good one. All I'm saying is that the money used to fund the CEO pay could not have been used to fund Foundation projects like Common Voice, as far as I'm aware.