Taking other people's creative works to create your own for-profit product is illegal in every way except when AI does it.

No, actually its completely legal to consume content that was uploaded to the internet and then use it as inspiration to create your own works.

https://www.fakespot.com/privacy-policy

Internet or other electronic network activity (e.g., browsing history, search history, information regarding an individual's interaction with an internet website, application, or advertisement, and online viewing activities)

Category of Third Parties to Whom Personal Information is Sold and/or Shared: Advertising partners, Service providers

Just a snippet of the privacy policy. There's other bad stuff too like location tracking. It's also all ran through Google analytics.

So much for a privacy respecting Mozilla

Same reason why they serve Lemmy instances despite illegal content on Lemmy: section 230 of the DMCA

Grayjay seems to fix things real fast, been using that a lot lately

BaSeD

Still good to have, but too bad they couldn't just piggy back off of Brave's soft fork or something and keep the functionality.

It's probably not a total lie, a dedicated chip for specific calculations is probably the only way that we'll see major jumps in processing power for a long while. It can be really effective for highly specific stuff. But the headline itself is certainly pure clickbait on the Verge's and Flow's behalf.

The ego of an Australian regulator that thought they could tell an American company what they could or could not distribute to non-Australians must be huge. (To clarify, twitter had blocked the video for Australians)

I know the US has a reputation for thinking it's laws apply everywhere but this is on a whole new level

"option likely to achieve the most positive outcome for the online safety of all Australians, especially children."

IPFS is not built on a blockchain

If it brings you value

Nope, they cut all the Mozilla stuff out

$4 is probably way more than enough to cover the cost of your account, but the problem is what percentage of people are paying. If it's 1 in 100 or 1,000 and $4 covers 75 average accounts they might be in a bind.