[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But if it was a 20 year old man with a 15 year old girl, would you still not mind?

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

I have not seen many leftists not agree that both votes are for genocide - that's just a given.

But protesting the system during the election is daft. Do you want genocide, or more genocide? You are not a slave to the system if you vote and then actually do something about it to change it.

Ignoring the current system is plain ignorance. Voting doesn't make you a slave. Voting and giving up makes you a slave. How about vote and campaign for change instead. Despair does not lead to change.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

That's been my experience on Lemmy recently too. It feels like there is a push to disenfranchise to "teach them a lesson we dont support genocide by ensuring a somewhat more genocidal maniac gets in instead".

I get the sentiment, but it ignores the two party system, and not voting does not fix that broken system, it ensures it. And I think the trolls know this too.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She has been talking about a different way of doing things though, I got the feeling she talked about many policies in the debate that people have ignored.

Non American here, but it really feels like there is nothing she can do to shake the non-trump thing. Lemmy is full of "Trump bad", but I'm missing the "Kamala good". Its as though no one wants to say it, and it feels like it always comes back to Israel. That is understandable too, however she is not a one policy candidate, however it feels like that is how its reduced.

Honestly I get the feeling that its either:

  1. People being very opposed to one policy enough that its blinding them
  2. Literal trolls trying to make enough noise to make it a trump vs. Non-trump to disenfranchise the voters

I want to see the "Kamala stands good on policy X" posts here. They should exist but where are they?

No I dont condone the Israel shit, but there has to be more to it. That's too simple.

223
Queen Fien (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago by b_n@sh.itjust.works to c/cat@lemmy.world
[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I always wondered this too.

Found a website saying Youtube adviews are $100-300 per 10k (ad views, not video views). That's 1-3¢ per view. If we assume an ad is 10seconds, then your time is worth 0.1-0.3¢ per second, or $3.60-10.80 per hour.

An A380 looks to be 380-615 seats. I'd imagine they're more often optimising for space, so let's say 550.

Long haul flight, 10% of people at any time using inflight stuff, 8 hours, 4 ads per hour = 5500.18*4 ads watched. 1760 ads. There will be a massive premium for planes, but surely only one order of magnitude more (e.g. 10x). That's equivalent to give or take 20k YouTube adviews which would be $200-600 per flight.

There are a lot of planes in the sky every single day though....

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago

Just because something is expensive doesn't always mean that the standard of living of those making the product is any better. Nike sweat shops for example.

Consumers dont have a lot of transparent choices here. Governments have roles in regulating and making the true cost of products more transparent. I'd say businesses have that responsibility, but clearly that doesn't work, otherwise we wouldn't be here etc. Businesses dont want people feeling guilty when they buy their product, so why would they tell people.

For a business to be competitive in a harm free supply chain, then the playing field needs to be levelled. Transparent supply chains everywhere, make everyone feel guilty all the time, maybe something would change.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

Also, "line goes up" is a dick measuring contest between CEOs of different companies.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

Killing them I don't think will help. I wouldn't forgive them. But I hope society is able to rehabilitate that person, because killing others isn't something I believe is an accepted normal thing to do, and that person has problems that need resolving.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Traudulent freason

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

Ah, see that's where I am going wrong. I don't engage in any content, but I do code in Rust.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

I think he means that by contributing to the likes of threads legitimises the platform. And when you "create content" there, then you're essentially doing free labour for the venture capitalists, since their asset is only valuable if people use it.

[-] b_n@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

I'm genuinely curious, why do the points matter?

127
submitted 1 year ago by b_n@sh.itjust.works to c/videos@lemmy.world

This is just absolute madness. I love it

view more: next ›

b_n

joined 1 year ago