Who would challenge it?

This is so wrong it's absurd, it gives you absolutely no information on the history of this conflict. The current conflict dates back to the early 20th century, well before world war 2.

Well, I don't think they're lying per se. But when you ask a group of people "why is it you all believe this" of course they're going to respond "because we are right." I'm more asking OP why he would even post this guestion here than criticizing the people responding, he's not going to get any semblance of a helpful answer.

Oh yeah you're right, cyrax shot the bombs out of his chest as a special move, smoke did the fatality with them. I always hated robo smoke and the robots in general and hardly played with them.

I don't just want to learn what the article says, I want to learn what people think. That's why I'm using a network designed for discussion and not just, say, an RSS feed.

Does it mean black against black?

This is a stupid rule.

The good rule is to judge people as individuals and respect their autonomy.

I meant when the development of transportation infrastructure started, cars were certainly faster than trains.

What else has changed? Cars became available and roads were easier to build than tracks.

I'm not against trains, I love them, especially the prospect of using them for long distance travel between rural areas. But people in rural areas use cars because there was a natural incentive to use cars: they're faster than horses and trains and the roads were already there, bonus they can be used for work on the land as machinery. Car centric government policies really are an effect of the widespread use of cars. They entrench the current way things work and create inertia in moving forward from it, but they didn't create it, at least not in the middle of nowhere.

Hey man, you're on the internet making your opinions known too.

It's all 1 target: full of shit communists. They're so uniformly predictable its crazy. It's almost as if its a cult.