I mean I don't know how big it was worldwide, but where I'm from there was like a whole trend some years back where teens would have these, landline telephone speaker/mics you plugged in to the headphone jack to make calls and they'd have it hang around their neck when not using it it was the dumbest fucking thing I've ever seen.

I mean that's my point. I'd trust Reddit more than some completely random dude to handle my data you know? Why wouldn't I? At least with a centralized datamining piece of shit I know a part of what the data is used for and they're not just stalking me waiting to murder me or something. Blindly sharing whatever with some rando who just comes up to you like "hey you want some privacy" is just fucking weird. Some random dude could be any weird fucked up person you know? Maybe I'm over/underthinking this, but sometimes all of this just seems weird.

I agree, if you are. Never said anything about force feeding though.

A good dough is just good bread, but anyone who has ever eaten bread will know it'll dry and get hard if it sits out in the open for long enough. And even then, it can make for good breadsticks for sauce or soup or whatever if it's a good dough. Like I said, it all boils down to how good the dough/crust is. I don't really eat shitty pizza with shitty dough though so I don't really have the problem of "force feeding" the crusts. The dough, along with the tomato sauce is one of the most important parts of a good pizza IMO.

Yeah well dumb people will try dumb ways to magically make their dumb kids smart. Wicked smaht. We played them Mozart 24/7 so they'd be smaht and look at him. So smaht. And the kid grows up to be an insomniac serial killer who grew dissecting any animals they got their hands on.

It’s sad to see how AI advocates strive to replicate the work of artists all the while being incredibly dismissive of their value. No wonder so many artists are incensed to get rid of everything AI.

It's such a shame too. Like you can have a million sensible takes and opinions and views on the topic, pro-AI, but the discussion revolves around the same shit on both sides.

It is an amazing tool, and could be used (and is used, it's just obscured by the massive amount of shit and assholes trolling other people/artists) in so many creative ways. I'd been in a bit of a rut for quite a few years (partially because my brain no make happy chemicals or sleep), but I haven't been as excited about the possibilities and inspired maybe ever in my life (at least not for a decade or nearly two) with art and my own stuff. I'm finally drawing again after way too many years of letting my stuff gather dust.

We’re going to have to bet on the finns.

Please don't, for the sake of us all, it's the same over here unfortunately.

All of the shit is everywhere already. Fighting this shit is going to have to be a worldwide effort the same way bigots, fascists, nazis etc. are uniting worldwide. There is no place on Earth immune to idiocy, because most people are just idiots and/or fucking suck.

I'm so glad he's continuing after years of silence. I was scared for a moment we might never get more.

You have the right idea. To most people a lot of the stuff she paved way for and influenced in some way or the other, directly or indirectly in more experimental music scenes, probably still sounds awful. And it's not like this cult of personality thing people tend to have with hit and hip bands like The Beatles, but more about the whole scene and movement. She was involved with a lot of cool people back in the day - hell she was involved with Fluxus and if she didn't do anything else at all that's a big enough of a merit in it's own right.

The Japanese noise scene would definitely not be the same, Yamataka Eye and his work with Hanatarash, pre-'Super æ' Boredoms, Naked City, is vocally very similar. Yoko is just as much proto-noise/japanoise as Black Sabbath is proto-metal.

As lowly as Diamanda Galás speaks of her (Galás says that she can't sing, which is true, but it really is beside the point), I'd be hard pressed to believe she wasn't at least indirectly paving the way for her work. Hell they both draw from free jazz and both collaborated with Ornette Coleman.

Members of Sonic Youth have said she has influenced them, Thruston even did a track for 'Rising Mixes' (a la Ono's 'Rising' album) that featured, and Kim has been even more vocal about her. On the same album you can find Tricky (Massive Attack) and Ween as well. Ween has talked about her on at least one occasion. You can find quotes from Mike Watt of Minutemen and fIREHOSE talk very highly of her. Iggy Pop is apparently also a fan, which doesn't really surprise me. Björk?

And then finally for one very much direct and clearl influence: Dagmar Krause of Art Bears. There are times she sounds a little too similar, but to as much it does with Yamataka Eye and Diamanda Galás, they did it better. It's not like she's single-handedly made bands like Sonic Youth form their sound or anything. Influence can be more than just bands going "hey that sounds cool, let's do that, but like, in our own way".

Velvet Underground and Laurie Anderson I'd fathom as well and you put some of my thoughts (and many of these people's thoughts) nicely into words with that second paragraph. Especially considering the work of groups like Fluxus, among others.

I'm trying to be as coherent as possible I haven't slept in a couple of days.

The Holy Grail is so full of recognizable quotes that you can quote several lines from pretty much any scene and it'd be recognizable.

Not giving someone a platform on a stage is hardly using force to suppress people's opinions. Go parade nazism elsewhere, you have your platforms. I promise, when there's something worthwhile to read and respond to, people will.

Why give a nazi the stage? Why raise their opinions there? The points are and have been expressed in a civil manner for at least a century.

"If a holocaust denialist expresses their opinion in a civil manner why not give their point of view more attention"

"If a pedophile expresses their opinion in a civil manner why not give their point of view more attention"

"If a rapist expresses their opinion in a civil manner why not give their point of view more attention"

"If a misogynist/misandrist expresses their opinion in a civil manner why not give their point of view attention"

If this is seriously an issue you have a dilemma with I have nothing further to say to you.

These kinds of points of view get enough attention as it is. No one needs to give them any more.

You're more right than you realize, and not so archaic really. The texture of clouds, or even clouds themselves, mostly smaller, frizzy kind of clouds are called "pilvenhattara" where pilven is a possesive form of 'pilvi' - 'cloud' and hattara is kind of an abstract descriptive word, at least today. The translation of 'rag, tatter' is a bit more complex and at least a little unrelated. There might be some historic connection, since 'hattara' is kind of a descriptive word that describes (at least for quite a long time) a kind of specific type of clouds appearance, more so a small cloud that kind of just falls apart. It's more like a frayed rag and the 'hattara' specifically pertains to the raggedness/frayed part - like the actual physical/visual quality of it being kind of frailed or jagged, like a cloud and so it does relate to clouds.

Hattara as a mythological thing is a different thing itself and again, might have some historic connection - my best guess would be that the kind of creature it means is something that is kind of 'frayed' like a vision or a fog ora cloud or something and is only seen for a moment. I'm unfamiliar with that one, though I've read a ton about folk beliefs and mythlogy here.