[-] calabast@lemm.ee 24 points 5 months ago

That's not a great comparison, because no mass murderer on death row has ever come close to the level of deaths this CEO is responsible for.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 25 points 7 months ago

Maybe their whole service doesn't do any testing at all, it just auto sends a reply "We're sorry, we think there is a strong chance your child will inherit genes related to lower than average intelligence." to anyone dumb enough to pay them money.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 24 points 7 months ago

I weigh 175lbs naked, but you really can't trust those grocery store scales.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago

Common misconception. There's still PLENTY you can do, as long as your circuit's not dead, and there's not something wrong.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

Don't worry about it too much. I don't think this current trend will completely overtake the word "weird", but even if it does, you'll still be good-weird, Republicans will still be bad-weird, and people will know the difference, no matter what we call those things.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Game, Outer Wilds

Movie, Everything Everywhere All At Once

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

I think a tree falling is a little different from the double slit experiment, because the outcome of a tree falling will always be the same. That question is a little more philosophical about whether the pressurized air waves a falling tree makes are actually "sound" or whether it's the interpretation of those waves done by our ears and brains that actually counts as "a sound"

The double slit experiment actually has two different outcomes, and that's just some of that freaky quantum voodoo shit.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

Holy shit, it all checks out. President Garfield had a nephew named Rutherford B. Lasagna who he gave a high-ranking position to, just two weeks before he was assassinated.

(source: my ass)

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago
[-] calabast@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

If the names are listed vertically, than obviously the name on the bottom is carrying all the ones above it.

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

Well they did say "trying"

[-] calabast@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

The bill says the use of force is "justifiable" if a defendant believes that criminal trespass, robbery, or "unlawful camping" is occurring on their property.

Great, so not only does it let them shoot homeless people, it lets them do it even if they "believe" it's happening. So you can just shoot someone on your property for no reason at all, and say "well, I though they were performing a robbery".

view more: ‹ prev next ›

calabast

joined 2 years ago