[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 44 points 1 month ago

Now do western liberal democracies. What is voter turnout like there and what percentage of votes do winning parties typically get? Here i'll start you off:

US turnout is typically around 30% and winning parties hover around 50% plus minus a few points, that means only 15% of the eligible voters (which is not even all adults) ever support the government.

In Germany we had record turnout of 80% (usually it's lower) but the winning party didn't even get 30%, and now they are polling even below 25%. This means that in the best case of a record turnout election less than 24% of the eligible voters support the winning party.

None of our parties here could win 80% of the votes even if our turnout was only 40%. By the standard of liberal democracies Maduro is genuinely popular. Don't be a hypocrite. If you're gonna do math compare it properly.

If the opposition wants to boycot the vote that is their choice, but it doesn't invalidate the democratic mandate that Maduro has. It just shows that they know they are not popular and are afraid to be seen losing if they actually participate.

Instead they engage in underhanded plots to try and sabotage the elections, and collaborate with foreign powers to sanction Venezuela, make its people miserable, and try to overthrow its elected government. No wonder they are unpopular.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 3 months ago

I hate Kurzgesagt too much to be able to bring myself to watch this video. Do you mind summarizing it for us?

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 45 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Lol, they fucking kicked him out of the White House

This is how it went down according to Fox News:

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 50 points 4 months ago

Fascist on fascist violence. You love to see it.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Marshal Zhukov was right when he said: "We have liberated Europe from fascism, and they will never forgive us for it".

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Historically, has a military campaign that is almost exclusively bombing ever succeeded?

No. Wars cannot be and have never been won by air power alone. It is a fundamental basic military fact that air power by itself can't take and hold ground, which is what is ultimately required to win a war. As we are also seeing in Ukraine today, all of the fancy tech that today's militaries have is still secondary in importance to the basic infantryman who is the backbone of any war. Second is artillery by the way. Air power, missiles, drones, etc. are tertiary at best.

And if they really think that they will succeed with this approach where everyone else in history who has tried this failed (if sheer scale of bombing won wars then the US would have won Korea and Vietnam, but they lost the latter and fought to a stalemate in the former, and only because they actually deployed very large amount of ground forces for the Korean war) shows an utter illiteracy in military understanding. It shows that they have fully bought into their own bullshit, drank their own koolaid about American air supremacy having been what won the Iraq war rather than what it really was that did it which was massive amounts of CIA bribes.

If they want to win any kind of war they will have to deploy boots on the ground and we've seen very clearly not just over this past year but ever since a much weaker Hezbollah first kicked them out of Lebanon that nowadays the Zionist genocide forces are godawful when it comes to ground combat. Once upon a time in the 60s and 70s that may have been different as they still had a lot of Soviet WW2 veterans but all they've done for decades now is bully and murder an occupied population armed with sticks and stones and homemade weapons.

1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/ukraine_war_news@lemmygrad.ml

As usual with this source i will give a content warning that this is a right wing source and if you step outside of their solid geopolitical analysis you may see them say some very cringe reactionary things.

The piece itself is ok, as usual a decent summary of recent events. I could see nothing particularly objectionable, except perhaps for a couple of somewhat unserious terms that a Marxist wouldn't use, such as "totalitarian".

Also, i don't vouch in any way for the comment section, i generally don't read those but it's probably a mix of ok and very very awful, so enter at your own peril. I hope this is enough to address the recent criticism that was expressed here about sharing content from problematic sources.

23

Military expert Leonkov: The idea of Ukraine's contacts with Syrian terrorists may belong to London

Text by Anastasia Kulikova

Kiev has no weighty arguments left that would allow the Ukrainian Armed Forces to seize the initiative in the free defense zone. Therefore, Ukraine, with the help of militants from Idlib, will try to open a second front against Russia in Syria, military expert Alexey Leonkov told VZGLYAD newspaper. Earlier it became known about the arrival of Ukrainian instructors in Idlib and the contacts of the Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine with terrorist organizations in the region.

"Idlib province is a special zone, a kind of terrorist reserve, so to speak. Fighters who fought government forces in Syria and then laid down their weapons swore they would never fight again. And then they and their families were exiled there. Among them were immigrants, including from the former republics of the USSR. Russian aircraft, Syrian troops and the Hezbollah movement did not touch them. Those, in turn, very rarely attempted terrorist attacks, " said military expert Alexey Leonkov.

"Now, apparently, these militants have been used, "he added, noting that the" recruiter " Kirill Budanov has become one of the main terrorists. However, according to the interlocutor, the idea of Ukraine's contacts with Syrian terrorists may belong to MI6 and its head Richard Moore.

"But in the media space, the whole story is presented as if the initiator is Kiev, despite the fact that the Ukrainian leadership serves only as a screen. If the Anglo-Saxons are accused, they will shift responsibility to Ukraine, " the expert believes. At the same time, the Kiev authorities are not able to independently organize any of the announced operations.

"So, if we talk about the "purchase" of fighters from Idlib in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the question arises: how will they be moved to the free defense zone? We are talking about recognized terrorists who, as expected, will have to cross the territories of a number of sovereign countries. It seems that Ukraine does not have enough resources for such an action, so everything can happen under the patronage of London and, possibly, Washington, " Leonkov says.

He does not rule out that the militants will first be transported by British transport planes to a military base in Romania, and then sent on foot in armored vehicles to the territory of Ukraine. "Sending AFU instructors to Syria also looks feasible," the analyst continued. "They can travel by passenger transport to Turkey, posing as tourists, and then cross the border and end up in Idlib province."

The analyst recalled that the Ukrainian military often conducts terrorist operations using drones. "Despite the fact that the Syrian terrorists were the pioneers in this, the Ukrainian Armed Forces now have a lot of experience," he said.

Leonkov admitted that Ukraine, with the help of Britain and the United States, is trying to open a second front against Russian forces. "Kiev has no weighty arguments and forces left that would allow the Ukrainian army to achieve success on the line of contact in the free zone. In this regard, they targeted Russian military bases located on the territory of Syria. The enemy's plans look crazy, " the source emphasized.

However, this is quite in the interests of London and Washington. "Their gamble with the Gaza Strip is over. The Israeli army has not achieved a single goal, " the expert believes. The resumption of full-scale military operations on the territory of Syria will end in the defeat of the terrorists, he believes. "The Syrian Arab Republic will have a chance to clear the province of Idlib from militants. We should expect that the government forces will be supported by Hezbollah, the IRGC, as well as Russian forces that assist Damascus in the fight against terrorists, " the speaker said.

He separately mentioned the Syrian government forces. "Syria has strengthened its army since 2018. Damascus regularly conducts counterterrorism operations. In fact, the Syrian Arab Republic is in a semi-military situation, and the army is on high alert, " the speaker stressed. But, according to the expert, Syria will take steps only in the event of aggression by terrorists from Idlib.

Against the background of the encroachments of Ukraine and Britain in Syria, Russia faces significant risks. "The threat of terrorist attacks against our military bases in Syria exists constantly. If fighting starts from Idlib province, we will provide air support to government forces, " Leonkov concluded.

Earlier it became known that Ukrainian instructors are arriving in the Syrian province of Idlib. According to local sources, at least 250 people have already arrived. They should train the banned terrorist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham* to make drones. The Ukrainians were distributed to production facilities in the area of Jisir al-Shughur.

It is also indicated that various components for assembling UAVs were transferred to the militants. Their instructors brought them to Idlib in parts under the guise of civilian goods. According to a RIA Novosti source, "the Ukrainians and Americans are moving battles from Ukraine to Syria to open a new front against Russian forces in Syria."

It is noteworthy that a day earlier it became known that the head of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Kirill Budanov, is in constant contact with the aforementioned group. It is also indicated that the dialogue is being conducted with the head of the terrorist "Nusra" (banned in Russia terrorist organization), whose nickname is Abu Mohammad Julani. "They solve the issues of selling terrorist mercenaries and sending them further to Ukraine against the Russian army, "writes the Arabic edition of Al-Watan.

The focus of recruitment is on immigrants from the former Soviet Union, then these people are trained and transferred to Ukraine for at least two months. According to information from the west of Idlib and from the north of Latakia province, Ukrainian intelligence officers are recruiting fighters from the Caucasus, Uighurs, Turkomans, and Russians who consider Russia a hostile country.

1
1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

SHOCKING report on the total collapse of business in China by the Financial Times was yesterday blown out of the water by users on x dotcom—and then the newspaper's own source joined critics of the news outlet.

The FT reported on Thursday that Chinese entrepreneurship had virtually disappeared, with just 1,202 companies launched last year. Evidence was data from a monitoring service called IT-Juzi.

The grim report by FT writer Eleanor Olcott and its eye-catching graph was viewed more than a million times on x dotcom, slotting naturally into the excessively negative narrative the paper carries every day on mainland China and Hong Kong.

'VOICE OF REASON' The first person to raise an objection was Arnaud Bertrand, a China-based Chinese medicine specialist who has become a popular "voice of reason" against the western narrative that is poisoning minds against the country.

He pointed out yesterday morning that if you looked at a single business sector, such as restaurants, in a single location, such as one city, you could immediately tell that there were large numbers of new companies.

Multiply that over a country of 1.4 billion people and you ended up with millions of new companies—exactly as Chinese government figures said.

ERROR IDENTIFIED Then investment specialist Glenn Luk stepped in and pointed out the precise mistake that the Financial Times had made. It had taken its figures from a narrow list that limited itself to new start-ups funded by institutional investors time-lagged to a specific period.

The data in no way could be used to determine how many new companies had been started in China, Luk pointed out.

FT writer Eleanor Olcott fought back by posting that: "IT Juzi is China’s leading data provider on startups, tracking companies across basically every conceivable vertical that a VC would be investing in."

HE SHOULD KNOW Then, yesterday, a message appeared from Wen Feixiang, the head of the company whose data was used by the Financial Times for its shocking graph.

"Hey, I am Feixiang, the ITJUZI. COM Founder and CEO," he wrote. "The citation in this article regarding the number of Chinese startup companies From ITJUZI is inaccurate."

He confirmed that his research firm's list in no way showed the total number of new firms in China.

"The only ethical thing to do at this stage for the FT is to apologize to its readers, and withdraw the article," Arnaud Bertrand posted last night.

1
1
1
1
44
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml to c/worldnews@lemmygrad.ml

And it just coincidentally happens that the US has been threatening WADA to withhold funding if they don't do what the US wants (and this wasn't the first time either, they also issued the same threats in 2019).

So weird how WADA then concludes that they "had no choice" but to turn a blind eye to US doping and stay silent about the US's violations for "security reasons".

62

An interesting take on the current events in Bangladesh that i think is worth considering but i'm not sure that i agree with this perspective. Honestly i just don't know enough yet about the situation and i will reserve judgement until i do.

19
1
[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He didn't lose, he just cannot serve another term. She belongs to his party and he effectively campaigned for her. His popularity greatly helped boost her in the election. As a result of this election AMLO's party now has such a historic majority in government that the liberal media is fearmongering about how this may even give them a mandate to change the constitution.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

ISIL claims responsibility

This is false. The alleged ISIS announcement has already been identified as a fake. However it should be noted that this narrative was put out in a coordinated fashion by western media almost immediately after the attack in order to get ahead of the story.

So far what is known is:

  • the terrorists claim they were offered a substantial amount of money for the attack through a Telegram contact

  • the terrorists claim they were provided with weapons through a cache set up by a well organized network

  • the terrorists do not claim affiliation with ISIS

  • the terrorists were apprehended while frantically trying to reach the Ukrainian border

The fact pattern does not fit the MO of ISIS, this was not a suicide attack, it was meticulously planned and organized by a professional agency with substantial resources complete with a getaway plan for the terrorists.

I don't want to say anything more than this for now because this is not the time for speculation, we have to wait for all the facts. We will learn more in the coming days and weeks.

My deepest condolences to those affected by this heinous crime.

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 47 points 2 years ago

So what you're saying is...Russia seized the means of burger production?

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 2 years ago

AKHMAT [Chechen Military Unit under the Russian National Guard] Commander Apti Alaudinov commenting on the incident in Dagestan:

"If we start treating people differently, good or bad, only based on their nationality, then we‘ll turn into the same fascist,zionist government like Israel, we‘ll turn into those whom we‘re fighting in Ukraine.

A lot of jews live in Chechnya, serve in Akhmat and fight with us shoulder to shoulder. If we start treating them badly only based on their nationality, then the question arises what makes us better than these fascists? better than Israel? I don‘t think this is the correct way.

If our brothers from Palestine come to you, treat them well. If our Jewish brothers, who are fleeing the war, come to you treat them also well. These are civilians, not soldiers.

There are no bad nationalities - only bad people"

Source: DDGeopolitics

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It didn't take long and people have already uncovered Ukrainian intelligence working with Russian dissidents behind inciting this ugly incident:

As many independent Russian media outlets and activists point out, the Telegram channel Utro Dagestan that calls for anti-Semitic rallies in the North Caucasus is associated with former Duma MP Ilya Ponomaryov who is helping to set up Russian [neo-nazi] volunteer units fighting for Ukraine

https://nitter.net/leonidragozin/status/1718573392465477914

Ukraine-based Russian fugitive politician Ilya Ponomaryov identified himself as the channel’s “investor” back in May. Ponomaryov works on setting up Russian [neo-nazi] volunteer units fighting for Ukraine under the auspices of Ukraine’s military intelligence, the HUR.

https://nitter.net/leonidragozin/status/1718674725403025564

Basically we have a Russian liberal who is an asset of Ukrainian intelligence trying start a Jewish pogrom in a Muslim region of Russia to own the Kremlin...crazy times...

[-] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 49 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Taiwan. Hong Kong.

What point are you even trying to make here by just saying names of places that are part of China?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

cfgaussian

joined 3 years ago