This was my first thought, but apparently it's another right winger ::gasp::

Not sure why this is illegal. Against the company's terms of service, sure. But the government shouldn't be involved.

I really have to wonder who is down voting this comment.

From the man who ran the "Never Back Down" campaign and was nearly the first to do so...

This from a court controlled by the party that decries the federal government having too much power. Watch as the spiders eat their own and go on not caring.

The founding fathers would have been disgusted but not surprised by this behavior.

Abandon the the two party system and first past the post, vote local, get involved.

Jitsi has done a lot to improve functionality since lock down. Still pretty basic, but it's free and can do moderation.

Here's hoping she stays in to the primary and splits the Rep. vote.

If they don't bother releasing people locked up under laws that no longer exist, why would they bother retrying all those people? To be clear they should do both, but they don't do much of either.

Yarr!

And no one was surprised.

The US has also been passing laws to clamp down on protesting in the wake of the Dakota Access, BLM, and Stop Cop City protests.

The Drilled podcast is doing a season about the global legislative shift now.