[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

su-57 is the winner!

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago

They have been flying already. But i doubt very hardly the interceptions were anywhere near the ratio these people claim

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Rojava is the puppy baby of the schizo "post-left" and their fith-collunism around the world

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Because they don't want to mobilize as Russia is neoliberal. Russia has an independent central bank. If putin was so dictator and powerful like the West says, be would have already done that. The only people benefiting from this war are private Russian military companies. Russia should mobilize and wipe out the Ukrainian army, close the borders with the US and Japan with amassed troops, and prepare for a world war.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Brazil industry was destroyed in the 90s by Fernando Henrique Cardoso and his wholesale destruction of our antitrust, patent and industrial laws and companies, on orders of Clinton.

Bolsonaro destroyed the rest. I'm so happy that Venezuela stopped their own Bolsonaro (Maria) and their own FHC (the second place candidate). It's clear the US had the same plans.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The narrative will never end. NATO will never consider Russia a censitary democracy in public, as that would undermine their propaganda. There is no autocracy in Russia, much less a dictactorship. But if they consider a censitary liberal democracy a autocracy, was 1914 france or 1950s america one of them, or were black people not humans for them?

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This. This was never full-scale. They likely kept that line as means of two utilities: if russia lost the war (so fucking hard i think not even they believed it in the start of the war and now they likely don`t do again), they would say russia used all their force and mobilization capabilities against Ukraine. If they won, they would victimize ukraine as the "barbarian slavs" used their full force. But it NEVER was full-scale and even the "partial mobilization" russia did afterwards is ridiculously low in scale of men (maybe not in scale of industrial production as they are wrecking NATO weapon stocks) and of war effort.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I really hope from all my heart they keep believing in the supremacy of their planes. At the moment they decide to try some suicide ride against Russia by ukrainian pilots penetrating deeply with the f-18 and some advanced f-16 (not the trash ukraine will receive soon), they may have a not very exciting surprise and lose 4 planes for no Su-57.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 19 points 6 months ago

There is no possibility that "nothing gets better of worse" in the horizon. This would be seen by those who matter (political authorities in most countries of the world and local bourgeoisies) as another severe mutilation of international institutions which the same US and other countries fought for existing and undermine the prestige and image of the United States.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago

I would say brazil does a strong effort to not show itself as D tier.

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
In a joint statement, Brazil agrees with Colombia's idea of a plebiscite in Venezuela before the elections The measure was suggested by Colombian President Gustavo Petro to Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro last week.

The plebiscite, with a popular vote, would guarantee that whoever won the election - whether government or opposition - would not persecute the losing opponent.

The statement says that Brazil and Colombia "urged the government and opposition sectors to consider the possibility of reaching an agreement on democratic guarantees that could be referenced at the ballot box".

a warning to hexbear: many people from the brazilian left are increasingly opposed to lula due to how fernando haddad policies are neoliberal, due to campos neto (the bolsonaro appointed central bank leader) still being there, due to the partial privatization (capitalization) of petrobras being left alone with their own pro-"market" CEO, due to his approximation to macron and critique of maduro, and due to their inability to counter the fascist bolsonaro far right and rally the population like evo and maduro did against the gusanos from their own countries (instead with the right wing sector in PT appointing some military and right ministers since the start of the govenrment and "dialogue") . i only support lula now due to the fact bolsonaro may return. neocon propaganda is huge here and local political aristocracies and bourgoesies are supporting an impeachment call propaganda or the return of bolsonaro, and i actually fear that a lot with the coming of milei in argentina.

please be critical in the support of lula. im an anti-nato anarchist but i side with marxist-leninists who are nato-opposed, anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist. i`m fully opposed to the americanophile, anti-latin american left anarchist and post-anarchist infiltration in our movements as most brazilian anarchists are and had my own dark experience in a online anarchist organization (lunaria in discord) which was hijacked by them. for our liberation from the empire!

[-] eduds6@hexbear.net 22 points 7 months ago

They are preparing their offensive to iran as Ukraine right now prepares their siege of Moscow which they have been preparing since... (?)

view more: ‹ prev next ›

eduds6

joined 2 years ago