Erwähnenswert ist dass das alles nicht in Stein gemeißelt ist, die Partei DIE LINKE kann sich ändern und will das ja auch - ich bin optimist. Ich glaub was die brauchen ist schwung von unten.

hmm, danke für den hinweis! Deren Russland Positionierung find ich in der tat problematisch. Ich hoffe ja immer (wie auch z.B. bei der partei die linke) dass man solche problematische positionen durch reden überwinden kann, aber evtl bin ich da auch naiv. Also ist evtl auch eine Hoffnung, weil ich sonst nix anderes habe als zu hoffen auf diese eine Lösung.

(Auch weil ich denke dass einige die so eine positionierung vertreten den hintergrund haben dass so waffen-hersteller nicht von dieser krise profitieren sollten. Aber ich würd dem entgegenen, dass es nicht wirklich alternativen dazu gibt von kapitalistischen waffenherstellern waffen zu kaufen um damit die ukraine zu verteidigen. bzw z.B. sozialistische waffenproduktion ist halt unrealistisch, denn da muss eins erstmal den kapitalismus überwinden.

Mit dieser art von argumentation hoffe ich da leute zu mehr ukraine-solidarität zu überreden)

Reading recommendation: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/mark-bray-antifa-the-antifascist-handbook

May i present to you:

the antifacist handbook, free to download/read (in different formats like pdf/epub/html/plaintext):

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/mark-bray-antifa-the-antifascist-handbook

Downvoted, i think OP understands very well the historical context of the word.

dieses Addon ist großartig, aber ich hasse das ständige eindeutschen in diesem sub

I disagree - i think only relying on green electricity is good, but it won't solve the devastating status we are currently that is the climate catastrophe.

Scientists currently say we are on track of their worst predictions. We need radical change, and one such change is reducing our consumption of resources drastically, globally. Consuming less power makes it much easier to use green electricity for this power.

I think this is the wrong direction of trying to solve the climate catastrophe - as long as Big companies continue their egoistical greed for money, climate catastrophe will accelerate. As those big companies won't choose inconvenient but necessary solutions, they have to be forced by the state. If money is even a small amount of motivation, it is greenwashing.

We have to kill capitalism. This is the only solution which lets society focus on society instead of money.

The biggest challenge humanity as a whole is currently - i am not exaggerating - solving the climate catastrophe. In this context, i don't care if machine learning lowers barriers.

I don't want it even - Because we don't have that many resources available to solving this existential crisis of humanity. I want energy and resources to spent wisely with benefit to society. Much of how machine learning, AI and bitcoin, etc is used today does nothing (and is even harmful) in that regard.

I think i am hating AI this much is also due to the fact that we as humanity have big troubles fixing the climate catastrophe. And not only does AI in 99% not contribute meaningful things towards this huge challenge, rather it accelerates the problem with its huge energy needs. Needs which i call "waste" compared to the much more important problem of solving climate catastrophe.

It is the same reason i hate bitcoin.

This onion article captures my emotion much better than anything anybody has said in recent years. Because it expresses my Hate towards Managers which much power, much money - who could do lots of great things to society by being ousted. Those managers won't listen to any arguments i could give, nor would they ever see my argument. They care only about money and greed. By not listing facts this onion article is much more to the point.

It is glorious satire, loving it.

As an IT Professional i hate AI, because many People favor AI in Situations where statistical Algorithms are already good.

• it has huge energy needs to train a model on thousands on input data, compared to simply having a concise statistical algorithm who does the thing you want to do. Think Spam filtering (usually an statistical Algorithm) vs Captcha (in Google's case AI)
• It is much harder to debug and fixup after it has gone wrong. structrual Bias in the input data (think sexism, racism) is hard to remove on a big scale. Algorithms are easy to change.
• As Software Developer, i favor mimimalist but useful technology. Very few things AI can do (which Algorithms can't) are actually helpful to society.
• I think of Software Development as an Art of Craftmanship - AI is far away from that, it is like searching for needles in a hay stack in terms of finding solutions. And when you found a solution, you don't know why it works, you can't adapt it to other Problems easily.

I agree that AI can be helpful and inspiring for new Algorithms but in many cases AI is used to replace Algorithms, wasting huge energy resources in the process - instead of just improving said Algorithms.

Das ist einer der Gründe, warum es den Satz gibt "(Queer-)Feminismus ist für alle da" und damit auch Männer meint. Denn (Queer-)Feminismus kämpft ja gerade gegen toxische Männlichkeitsbilder.

Dass Männer nicht gut über Gefühle sprechen können heißt auch, dass sie beispielsweise manchmal die Gefühle von Frauen nicht so gut verstehen können.

Die im Artikel beschriebene "Stärke" und "geringe Emotionalität" bedeutet z.B. auch dass Männer mit ihre Gefühle mit Wut, lauter Sprache, Dominanz, Kompensationsverhalten und manchmal auch Gewalt zum Ausdruck bringen. Und das alles kann sich gegen sich selbst aber auch gegen andere Menschen richten.

Die Zeitung "Analyse & Kritikt" hat ein paar großartige Artikel zum Thema Männlichkeit: https://www.akweb.de/schlagwort/maennlichkeit/