Unless a characters race or gender or ethnicity or (dis)ability is a key component of either their arc or the story as whole (e.g. the plot depends on it), who the fuck cares who's playing who? I saw the same thing happen when the Dune movie had the Liet-Kynes character portrayed by a black woman. It makes absolutely zero difference to the story what gender or race Liet-Kynes was and she was really good anyway.
It's ridiculously expensive. It's not private if you have to link your searches to a paid account and none of those payment providers are private. They don't seem to have open sourced any of their key functionality, meaning you have to trust them to not be collecting your activity data.
I spent a long time getting rid of software and using services that I either no longer trusted or was unable to make an informed choice due to their lack of open source code and I'm not going to take a retrograde step now. And that's without the issue with their choice (a continued choice I believe) to use Brave results, a company I'm personally not prepared to support.
An actual life sentence for being the victim of rape.
I'm not American but what's happening in the US and what will happen when/if Trump gets re-elected definitely worries me. It's difficult not to sound overly dramatic or hyperbolic about the situation but it really does feel like the US is uncomfortably close right now to a christofascist state. And if you just rolled your eyes at that word, take a look at who's currently second in line to the US presidency.
If Trump does win, I really fear for American democracy. Do you really think a man who encouraged an armed insurrection to support a subversion of an election will pause to think twice about removing the few rights large sections of America currently have? And if the process prevents him, do you think he'd think twice about dismantling the process? At gun point if necessary?
- This story is about a Channel 4 appointment, nothing to do with the BBC.
- It's not C4 who have rejected her, they wanted her - it was the gvmt who told C4 they couldn't appoint her.
- She's the 3rd recent veto of a non-white appt by the gvmt
- The gvmt provided no reasons for the rejection
Reddit was created as a Digg clone so there were no sub's and no comments, just links to up/down vote.
A lot of those links were scraped in an effort to make it seem popular. Both Aaron and Spez have admitted that.
"Your info won't be used for ads"
But we'll still be tracking everything you do and selling that on to everyone who wants it.
Nothing is open source and my days of choosing to trust companies upfront are long gone.
So much with anything privacy comes down to trust. Any piece of software's technical ability to keep you private is of course important but when it comes to a very large (in terms of code and use) piece of software, being able to trust the motivations and intent of the people behind it is also very important.
It's now reached the point that I personally don't feel I can trust the person leading the company, or the intent behind the software(s) the company makes.
Brendan Eich is a homophobe and an antivaxxer. It's hard to trust in the common sense of a man who thinks in these ways.
Brave has been caught inserting affiliate links and ads that track and just recently of selling other people's data. Any one of these things, taken in isolation is bad enough but this is now a pretty much established pattern of very questionable behaviour.
I also forsee a time when the browser is going to have to make some concessions to it's Chromium base. I know they've said the change from Manifest v2 to 3 won't affect ad blocking as their Shield won't be an extension but built in and that they'll also carry on supporting v2 but the issue goes beyond merely adblocking and they've been unclear on exactly how and for how long they'll support v2. As long as they're Chromium based browser, they are dependent on Chromium and the whims of Google developers. It's hard to see a good future for Brave.
Using 'female' in that context does give off, at best, vibes of someone who doesn't have much contact with women. Feels like someone classifying an unfamiliar species, rather than referring to an actual person.
Is it possible to (at least temporarily):
- Turn off instance image hosting (disable pictrs)
- Disallow image and video posts across all communities
- As in Firefish, turn off caching of remote images from other instances.
whilst longer term solutions are sought? This would at least ensure poor mods aren't exposed to this shit and an instance could be more positive they're not inadvertently hosting CSAM.
Sadly, 99% of people - wherever they live - won't really do or say anything until it affects them personally.