The Olympics are going to be another litmus test
It depends on what you consider the crime to be. Is it the mom outing her kid's porn habits or the kid using a platform in the way it's meant to be used, but not by kids of his age?
If it's the latter, I'd argue that is a victimless crime. If it's the former, then yes, the kid (male or female) would be the victim.
For those people who have Nebula:
https://nebula.tv/videos/notjustbikes-these-ugly-big-box-stores-are-literally-bankrupting-cities
As a sufferer of Long Covid, Sergey Brin can suck my ass. Any company can deem themselves lucky if I manage to make 40 a week. There's more to life than work, and it's not like they'll pay you for those extra 20 hours.
And the IDF needs to be held accountable for their war crimes. Thing is, they're not targeting Hamas, they're targeting innocent bystanders.
Not all protests are against oil companies.
I was in the market for a new car. And Tesla was not even on my long list of cars to consider, precisely because of Herr Sturmbahnführer Musk.
> sudo make guitar
*ends up in dependency hell*
Where the hell did I leave my shark repellent?
Just get a small loan of a few million bucks from your dad!
Don't fuck a car's tailpipe. Or at least wait until it's cooled off.
Condé Nast didn't just sell access to their subsidiaries' content, but also to the user generated content on those subsidiaries' sites. That's at issue here.
It also has a possibility to cause a conflict of interest for Ars Technica to write about OpenAI. That's the second issue here.
And, as per the editor in chief, the money doesn't go to Ars Technica, but to Condé Nast.
madjo
joined 2 years ago
A person in dress asked me to call them by their new name?!
why I never!