Why not both?
Judging from the way many of my neighbors reacted to a homeless camp moving into a local park, I think there a lot of ~~people~~ homeowners who would literally jump at the first opportunity to "disappear" unhoused people
Ah, capitalism
If you really want to protect children, start by going after fossil fuel companies
I mean, if you can afford to pay your workers a living wage, then you can't afford to field that job in the first place.
Getting rid of a company that pays my neighbor poverty wages is better for my community (and therefore for me), than letting said company keep delivering me a service of convenience while my neighbor can't afford to buy food.
This is the bad place
Flipboards been fucking crushing their platform rollouts
I'm probably the most vocal person for car-free lifestyles and micro mobility in my community, and I absolutely hate the the effect that these stupid things have in the car-free discussion.
At least as their existing solutions were rolled out, they made public spaces uglier and more dangerous for all involved.
That photo makes it look like a giant pregnancy test lol
I mean if you take a look at the government of Saskatchewan, this makes sense. Not measuring pollution is basically something that Canadian conservatives will hand out subsidies and tax breaks as rewards for
I remember Boston recently elected a really awesome mayor who prioritized transit...does anyone know how she's doing politically?