[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Problem is this "collaboration" is a joke as well.

When you allow russia or saudi arabia or whatever else piece of shit use it to prosecute their "criminals" or at least as a public forum where they say who they want to prosecute it turns into a circus.

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

It was shit with horrible semi-working never updated java applets that were always broken, unless you used right version of ie and windows. But it was certified by proper authority. 🥴

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Your white mans burden leaks, better take care of it if you can.

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

And there won't be any reprecussions again.

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago
[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 weeks ago

You post the same data now with article that doesn't even have word "steam" in it. Your various sources weren't linked. I think that clears why your source is "nonsense".

Yes my words are changed because, you somehow read me saying multiple times of steam being monopoly in single use of phrase, steam behaves like a monopoly. I repeat, not liking one store doesn't make me a fan of another, they both are horrible.

As for examples of anti-competitive behaviour, price matching that is being discussed in comments here is a big one, don't you think?

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Your "source" is an image that doesn't even differentiate between various stores and lists everything as blue, with text that says "steam revenue is probabaly x billion". I couldn't find anything except other similar images when looking up Pelham Smithers reports. In reports from previous years steam is not mentioned. I will rephrase it then if you dislike the word I am using: Steam has a dominant position in the pc gaming market and uses it to their benefit which doesn't (in my opinion) coincide with consumer benefit, also their app is shit.

P.S.: I've used the word monopoly once

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 weeks ago

As evidenced by this post, they are not a monopoly. So what does this statement actually mean?

This post gives evidence of the contrary, game that dared not to be published on platform that has 70-80% of pc market share ( https://www.geekwire.com/2024/gaming-giant-valve-hit-with-another-antitrust-lawsuit-alleging-anticompetitive-practices/ ) shouldn't even exist and even stating otherwise is a blasphemy, lol. As for more anecdotical examples, games that are published on steam only, are majority most don't even list other platforms on their web sites, in cases when they can be bought elsewhere. Even more, updates and patches often do not reach other marketplaces. So yeah steam is a shitty marketplace with horrible ui and captured fanatical clients.

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 weeks ago

There is no alah, friend. muslim religion just wasn't as strong and oppresive on indiginous people back in 12-13 centuries.

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 weeks ago

Care to name a few of these people from the last 300 years?

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

russians of course! Haven't you heard that not giving your country to russia is nazi-imperialism?

[-] nesc@lemmy.cafe 0 points 3 weeks ago

Because expertie-experts dislike it while not providing any alternative? No.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

nesc

joined 4 weeks ago