[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Yes and it is a good thing we don't anymore.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah why would you go on a microblogging platform if you didn't want to see "weird political shit"?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

it is also the name of the city of Rome in many languages (e.g. Italian), but that is not what is intended here

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Yes; more interesting is which videos are at the top of a search for, say, "Kamala Harris" or "Donald Trump"; if those videos tell lies about these people (which could cause them to lose an election in a few months), what is the liability there?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago

If that were true, Disney and similar companies should be lobbying for the abolition or at least weakening of copyright, which we can tell isn't the case.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

That says it is speech to text, not text to speech

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Most of them are. IntelliJ and PyCharm have open source community editions.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

I remember reading that one of the Scandinavian languages had a specific (successful) governmental policy to change from German-like numbers to English-like ones. I don't remember which of them it was.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia articles are supposed to summarize "reliable sources" and be neutral among them, but not give equal weight to "unreliable sources".

Here's the thing: people have by now figured out that if you first define sources that say things you like as "reliable" and sources that say things you don't like as "unreliable", then you can turn Wikipedia into a propaganda organ for whatever you want.

Wikipedia is neither an especially good source nor an especially bad one.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Breyer hat gestern das hier gepostet https://digitalcourage.social/@echo_pbreyer/111229348264343150 evtl beantwortet das deine Frage

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Moderation is different from censorship.

I am not ever opposed to moderation. If you don't want to see something, you shouldn't have to.

I am opposed to most censorship. People who want to discuss their bad ideas with each other and everyone who wants to read them should be allowed to.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

I never used Digg at all. Before the Internet consisted almost exclusively of "social media", I was mainly on topic-specific web forums run on software like phpBB and SMF.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

schnurrito

joined 1 year ago