I guess Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning were just hapless chaps stumbling around in the dark, until Elon lighted their way with his genius vision of how to build an EV. /s

So much so I had to google their names because even I can't remember them.

Look at that young whippersnapper. I had one for my discman.

Yeah. I worked for a US-headquartered multinational in Asia, and we had to do a whole training about how we had to be scrupulous in not doing anything that could be interpreted as a boycott of Israel otherwise the company would be breaking the law.

Thanks for that. It looks from that like a relevant detail OOP missed out is that these thing (purportedly) claim to produce as much oxygen as 15 trees, which isn't nothing.

That's an interesting thought, but I don't think it stands up to the slightest bit of scrutiny.

like 100 times

Is it closer to 100 or closer to 3?

They're not saying it because they believe it to be true, they're saying it because they need it to be true in order to justify what they're doing.

hur, hur, you said VAG

Glinner is the biggest argument I've seen against Death of the Author, because once you know you're supposed to be laughing at the marginalised character and with the characters mistreating them, it's impossible to find it funny.

There's lots of examples of it too. The first time watching the theatre trip episode where a judge in drag opens the play, I'd read Roy's discomfort with the show being "too gay" as a joke on Roy being out of his element; we were supposed to laugh at his discomfort. But on rewatching it's hard to shake the idea that actually Roy's defence of "I don't want his sexuality rubbed in my face" is meant as something the audience is supposed to identify and agree with, and that far from being a knowing playful nudge at gay theatre the whole thing was a mean-spirited caricature of it. The meaning does get changed whether Roland Barthes likes it or not.

Thank you.

"I don't have to know CS201 Data Structures and Algorithms to do my job", says a thousand D-tier coders online, whose code is costing their employers a small fortune in unnecessary cloud compute bills because they just blindly imported a ton of python libraries and went with the least suitable data structures and algorithms for the task at hand, because that's what the defaults were for that library. "It fulfils all the requirements from the client perfectly, bow to my experience and skill in delivering customer value".

It's classic Dunning-Kruger, incompetent people who are too incompetent to know they're incompetent.

Bonus points when they cite the fact that they were involved with a project that cost a hundred million dollars, as "proof" that they're a world-class expert, when it probably would have been a ten million dollar project with an actually competent engineer...

Sod 'em.

Also, screw it, #79 should be Aurium.

You'd really be fucking Spandau Ballet over with that one.