Thanks Margot, for taking some time out of your busy schedule to post this fabulously intricate meta-contribution on bots, identity, and social media! Its much appreciated.

Arbeiter wollen Ausgleich der Inflation, genau wie das Management

Management: "Das geht nicht aus Gründen."

Ist schon klar, ihr Pfeffersäcke.

Ja, am Ende ist es eine sowohl-als-auch Situation, keine Frage.

Um hier mal das Widerwort einer materiellen Linken anzubringen: was hilft es mir, wenn ich mir als Mann meine Gefühle eingestehen kann, aber trotzdem kein Profi da ist, der mir damit helfen kann? (Weil das Gesundheitssystem auf Kante genäht ist und auch die ach so progessiven und empowernden, queerfeministischen Parteien niemals die Steuern für Reiche so erhöhen würden, dass die fehlenden Therapeuten dann bezahlt werden könnten?)

Nix gegen mentale Arbeit im Überbau (und Dekonstruktion von Männlichkeit schadet ganz sicherlich nicht), aber ohne Basis gehts nicht.

Wagenknecht gründet ne Partei? Ja Mensch, etwa so?

What brain-dead form of utilitarianism is that supposed to be? The "I'm-16-and-on-a-wikipedia-bender"-kind?

We don't hold 6-year-old children accountable for very much in a legal sense, because they are essentially animals able to (barely) speak. Thats why we instead regulate gun-ownership, so that no child has access to firearms. And if that doesn't seem to do the trick yet, I'd suggest regulating more comprehensively and holding parents accountable, so that it is very much in their own interest to keep guns from kids. We might also fund social services and schools to the extent that children are able to adequatley learn how to control their emotions and verbalise anger, unhapiness in a non-ciolent way, even if their parents are a bunch of irresponsible idiots.

That seem much preferable to executing a six year old every once in a while to be save.

the messaging has been consistently toned down in the hopes people would listen.

My guess is its even more than this: deadlines were extended to not let people fall into inaction. The tipping point always close enough so that its dangerous, but still far away enough so that there is still hope. It is a ploy analogous to the fascist "the enemy is strong enough to be dangerous and weak enough to be thoroughly defeated."

This scene is far more realistic, I think. But as you can tell, it doesn't play very well with either the audience or the media.