Taking out just Turkmenistan here for instance completely blunts this and Uzbekistan while possibly to bypass by a long routing around via Kazakhstan is also pretty important.
I'm guessing these countries will be making bank on tolls on these routes. Even a pro-US government would not be very happy if asked to shut them down.
Expecting logic from the stock market was your first mistake
Even in the long term, it (1) breaks the river into pieces, preventing fish moving up and down, (2) causes silting of the reservoir and lack of silt deposition downstream, and (3) can stress the underlying rock, which is not a great idea in earthquake-proe areas (like northeast China).
Trump 'supported' such policies to get elected. Might as well keep reminding his voters what he promised to do, so that when he fails to do any of them you can convince some people to jump ship.
I don't get it. If an organisation loses its tax-exempt status, it will have to pay tax. This would definitely be bad news for the organisation. But how does it 'kill any nonprofit’s ability to function'? Why would they be unable to get banks to service them or get donations? Is it just hyperbole, or am I missing something?
Considering what happened to the last two whistleblowers, I wouldn't want to piss off Boeing either.
I'm guessing hydro-electric also requires a water supply.
Cake was never an option.
They are all Bourgeois parties at the end of the day
Hasn't Morena done a lot to reduce poverty and build infrastructure in the provinces?
Maybe they want to fire people, but don't want to pay severance?
Marxism-Leninism-Mao zeDong thought