Tina Cracker.
I'm looking forward to fucktons of individual suits absolutely slamming the courts every time an EO is issued. crowdfund the filing fees. turn petitions into copypasta. DDoS the Court system. they literally asked for this.
we're headed for Barry though. 😞
that's disappointing. I didn't know about that.
feels increasingly like fleeing Russia for Germany after a pogrom against your shtetl.
Switzerland used to have all their bridges wired to blow. They should probably get back on that :/
handguns are much more common in homicides in general, but I think rifles are the weapon of choice in school shootings and other acts of domestic terrorism. they have more potential to kill a larger number of people in a shorter amount of time from a greater distance. in particular I'm thinking about the Las Vegas shooter who infamously used bump stocks to rain bullets on a crowd.
incidentally, we almost banned handguns decades ago. it's my understanding that that attempt at a ban - saved by last minute edits - are responsible for outlawing short-barreled rifles (they were trying to prevent people from making their rifles into handguns.)
They're not JUST for killing people and/or sport. Every reason you could legitimately need a gun for, the broad category "semi auto rifle" covers, so banning them has a disproportionate impact to people who use them legally and as tools vs banning handguns.
but do those purposes need semi-auto? can you not afford the extra second to charge the weapon between shots? the only situation I can envision is needing to protect yourself from criminals with semi-autos, which is a legitimate concern.
read up a bit. there's an interesting concurrence(!) from Kavanaugh, which basically said they're too busy, come back later.
look into NixOS! there might already be a package for it. and NixOS can be very good about not duplicating dependencies.
MQ-9 Reaper my beloved
right, you said it was stupid because:
Just imagine that you're in a conflict, then the enemy hacks your command and control systems and disables/hijacks all of your aircraft. Yeah, that's pretty dumb.
I'm saying that scenario wouldn't be possible. for the enemy to exploit a backdoor like this, they'd have to either:
- break the encryption (quantum computer, classical sub-exponential discrete log or factoring algorithm.)
- break the protocol or encryption (unlikely, since it'd be simple, the NSA is full of competent cryptographers, and they'd probably formally verify it to EAL-5.)
- steal the private key (most likely imo, but the government also safeguards the nuclear codes, and it's hard for me to imagine F-35 kill switch keys being more dangerous than those.)
I don't think any of the above are very likely, or at least not likely enough to outweigh the strategic benefit of being able to ground your enemy's air force in the (hitherto unlikely) scenario one of the US's customers became its enemy. so I don't think it's stupid, and I don't think I straw-manned you.
I kinda get why tankies would defend China (CCP is still ostensibly Communist), but why Russia?? it's literally a kleptocratic oligarchy led by a billionaire dictator/mob boss. ain't nothing Soviet about it.