[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

I think they DO.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

I think a heat map might disagree with that on a red vs blue state level, but if that map was specifically by income, I agree it would be higher in poor areas.

How to word this… poor people are killed more than rich people, but poor people are killed more often in red states than in blue. Something like that.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

Imagine being so obsessed with the USA. lol

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

All the rich have to do is keep raising rent, keep home prices high, and continue lobbying to take our rights away… so far, they have been wildly successful with zero evidence of it slowing.

The price I’m paying now for a 2 bedroom apartment in the suburbs in a “pretty good” complex is $2200/m. It’s not fancy, just average.

10 years ago, in the same area, I rented a three story, three bedroom, two car garage townhome for $1500.

I am making about the same amount of money now than I was then. I’ll take that amount, because more isn’t possible to find right now.

Minimum wage in my area is ~$16.50

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

Oh, well that explains everything, you are using it wrong.

A lot of people think that you’re supposed to argue with it and talk about things that are subjective or opinion based. But that’s ridiculous because it’s a computer program.

ChatGPT and others like it are calculators. They help you brainstorm problems. Ultimately, you are responsible for the outcome.

There’s a phrase I like to use at work when junior developers complain the outcome is not how they wanted it: shit in shit out.

So next time you use AI, perhaps consider are you feeding it shit? Because if you’re getting it, you are.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

Tell me more about how you’ve never ever used it and that everything you’re saying is influenced by the media and other anti-ai user comments.

Let’s see what happens when I google for UFOs or chemtrails or deep state or anti-vaccine, etc. how much user created delusional content will I find?

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

So… you have no clue at all what any of this is. Got it. I’ll bet you blame video games for violence.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago

Okay so it has guardrails already. Make them better. Government regulations can’t be specific enough for the daily changing AI environment.

I’d say AI has a lot more self regulation than social media.

But, I run ai on bare metal at home. This isn’t chatGPT. And it will, in theory, do anything I want it to. Would you tell me that I can’t roll my own mania machine? Get out of my house lol.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

You are creating a conversation that does not exist. I don’t have concerns about not banning kitchen knives? I’m comparing tools to tools and you are turning a conversation to something you feel like screaming and yelling about because this is the dopamine time for you.

I will not speak to someone who puts words in my mouth, and doesn’t use their ears.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think that more effective regulation would be on social media

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

I never used the word epidemic. I don’t believe the article use the word epidemic.

If we want to talk about things that are more damaging to People, let’s talk about social media. That is exponentially more damaging than AI.

[-] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 week ago

Do you think they will allow North Koreans to board the plane and go to Russia… and then run?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

womjunru

joined 1 week ago