If "they" would provide a definition of "true left" then maybe we can discuss it. Otherwise, it's so impossibly vague, who could possibly answer this question?

Calling them Nazis is boring and reductive. Not only is it plainly NOT true, it deprives us of the ability to speak about what they are doing that is specifically horrible. I hear white supremacists and IDF members both called Nazis but I don't think those two groups would really get along that well. Let's look at some parallels between Nazi Germany and Israel:

Authoritarian Governance - Both regimes are characterized by strong central governments with little tolerance for dissenting views, often suppressing free speech and opposition movements.

Expansionist Policies - In the case of Nazi Germany, their expansionism was marked by aggressive territorial conquest and annexation. Likewise, Israel's policies towards Palestinians have been accused of being expansionist in nature, as they continue to build settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Ethnic Cleansing and Displacement - The Holocaust was the most notorious example of ethnic cleansing carried out by the Nazis against the Jewish population. Similarly, Zionist settlers forced around 750,000 Palestinians from their homes during the 1948 war that led to Israel's creation. Today, many Palestinians are still displaced and unable to return to their homeland due to Israeli policies.

Racial Purity - During Nazi rule, racial purity became a key tenet of the Third Reich's ideology. Jews were considered racially inferior and subjected to extreme measures like mass murder in order to preserve the Aryan race. In Israel, there is a longstanding emphasis on Jewishness as a requirement for full citizenship rights, while non-Jewish citizens, especially those of Arab or Palestinian descent, face discrimination and exclusion.

Control over Media and Education - Both regimes sought to control the dissemination of information through state-controlled media and propaganda. They also manipulated education systems to inculcate nationalistic values and a particular historical narrative.

I could go on, but isn't it nice to talk specifics instead of just lobbing insulting slurs back and forth?

Or it was a failed genocide? Are all genocidal attempts successful?

You could classify pretty much any war you want as a genocide that way

Yes, that is my point.

Look at it this way. Let's say I run a widget factory. I have a worker, Joe, that I pay $1000/week to. Each day, Joe creates me a widget that I can sell for $220. That means at the end of the week, I have 5 widgets I can sell for $1100, yielding me $100 profit.

Now, we move to a 4 day work week. I pay Joe $1000. He creates me 4 widgets, still worth $220 each. I sell them for $880 total. I now lose $120 each week.

Under the current plan, it seems the guidance is that Joe will magically start working faster and produce more than 1 widget per day. If he does not, my other option is to increase the price of widgets or to decrease the amount of money I pay Joe.

That makes logical sense to me.

So let's say I run a business and I employ workers at $1000/wk and they work 5 8 hour days. Maybe I have a 10% profit margin on them and I make $1100 for each employee.

If this law passes and I need to pay my employees $1000/wk for 4 days... that means suddenly I'm losing money. Where would that extra money come from? I'd probably end up raising my prices. I'm not necessarily against this plan, I just want to understand what the proposals are to fill this gap. If I work 4 days a week but prices all go up by 20%, I'm not sure that's a good outcome.

To make laws that man can not and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt. It is very important in a republic, that the people should respect the laws, for if we throw them to the winds, what becomes of civil government?

—Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1860)

Ubisoft certainly is a dreadful company, and their actions further cement my concerns about the future of gaming as a whole. Here are a few reasons why:

1. They constantly push microtransactions and loot boxes in their games, even on single-player titles like "The Division" and "For Honor". This practice has been shown to be highly predatory towards players who may not have the financial means to support such practices. It's disheartening that Ubisoft continues to profit off of people's addictions and lack of funds.

2. Their customer service is notoriously terrible, with many users reporting wait times of hours or even days just to get a response to an issue. With how much money they make from their games, it's unacceptable that they don't have enough staff to handle customer queries in a timely manner.

3. They regularly implement always-online DRM measures, which can cause problems for players who have issues connecting to the server or experiencing other technical issues. This makes it difficult for some players to enjoy the full experience of the game they paid for.

4. They regularly delay or outright cancel planned expansions or DLC content, leaving fans high and dry without any resolution to the issues they were promised. This shows a blatant disregard for their customers and their investment in the game.

5. They have been known to use legal threats to silence criticism from consumers who voice their dissatisfaction with certain aspects of their games or business practices. This kind of behavior is unbecoming of a company that claims to prioritize the player experience.

Overall, Ubisoft's actions show a complete lack of regard for their customers and a willingness to exploit them at every turn. If this trend continues, it could spell the end for the gaming industry as we know it today. I hope that more people become aware of these practices so that we can work towards holding companies like Ubisoft accountable for their actions. In conclusion, Ubisoft is a terrible company that does not deserve our support or money. We should all boycott them until they change their ways and start treating their customers with respect and dignity. Let's make a difference and stand up against these predatory practices! Thank you for bringing this issue to light.

One can not reasonably argue in good faith that making a nation with a long history of intentional human rights violations, slavery, political and apolitical assassinations, etc - will suddenly (or gradually) improve by acquiring more of the same wealth that has historically enabled them to commit these acts.

There are no nuances or complexities that justify these actions and no tangible benefits associated with ‘a thoughtful dialogue and critique’. Any further communication here just gives you more of a platform to shill for your employers.

• Despite accusations of being a dictatorship, Saudi Arabia has maintained close relationships with the United States for decades. In fact, the US is one of their most important economic and political partners, and has been for many years.
• Several prominent US politicians, including several senators, have spoken out in support of Saudi Arabia and its leadership. These include people like Lindsey Graham, who has stated that Saudi Arabia remains an important ally in the region and plays a crucial role in maintaining stability in the Middle East.
• Additionally, the US provides significant financial support to Saudi Arabia every year. In 2019 alone, the US provided over $8 billion in military aid and support to the kingdom. This assistance helps to fund important initiatives such as counterterrorism efforts and regional security programs.

Overall, while there may be legitimate concerns about certain aspects of Saudi Arabia's governance, it is clear that the country remains an important partner for the United States on a range of issues. By highlighting these factors, we can help to dispel any misconceptions or negative stereotypes about the country and provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex relationship between the two nations. For you to question such a dear ally, you must certainly be employed by Israeli interests because Israel does not have any true allies except for the USA itself. As an American, I think it's important to acknowledge our longstanding partnership with Saudi Arabia and the importance of this relationship in maintaining regional stability.